Jane Jacobs

jacobs.1900.2.jpg

The passing of Jane Jacobs, urban expert, social activist, and author of The Death and Life of Great American Cities has been noted throughout the blogosphere. See e.g. Dean Dad’s post at Bitch, Ph.D. and Siva Vaidhyanathan’s post at Sivacracy.net. Her NYT obituary is here. It noted:

In her book “The Death and Life of Great American Cities,” written in 1961, Ms. Jacobs’s enormous achievement was to transcend her own withering critique of 20th-century urban planning and propose radically new principles for rebuilding cities.

At a time when both common and inspired wisdom called for bulldozing slums and opening up city space, Ms. Jacobs’s prescription was ever more diversity, density and dynamism : in effect, to crowd people and activities together in a joyous urban jumble.

Her critique of the nation’s cities is often grouped with the work of writers who in the 1960’s shook the foundations of American society: Paul Goodman’s attack on schooling; Michael Harrington’s stark portrait of poverty; Ralph Nader’s barrage against the auto industry; and Malcolm X’s grim tour of America’s racial divide, among others. And it continues to influence a third generation of students.

It also said: “Indisputably, the book was as radically challenging to conventional thinking as Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring,” which helped engender the environmental movement, would be the next year, and Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique,” which deeply affected perceptions of relations between the sexes, would be in 1963. Like those two writers, Ms. Jacobs was able to summon a freshness of perspective. Some dismissed it as amateurism, but to many others it was a point of view that made new ideas not only thinkable but suddenly and eminently reasonable.”

Interesting that the two “radically challenging” books that her book is compared with by the NYT were also written by women.

–Orly Lobel and Ann Bartow

Share
This entry was posted in Feminism and Culture. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to Jane Jacobs

  1. Joel says:

    How refreshing that Jane Jacobs work was able to stand on it’s own too feet, not as the work of a “feminist” urban theorist but just as the work of an “urban theorist” – who happened to be a woman.

    As far as I am concerned (as a male), that is the end point of feminism, when women have the ability to act and speak not within the pre-defined bounds of “woman” but as any male member of society might.