“It is dangerous to stand up to a military dictatorship, but more dangerous not to.”

That’s a quote from Benazir Bhutto’s op-ed in today’s NYT. She also writes:

… Opposition party members, lawyers, judges, human rights advocates and journalists have been rounded up by the police without charge. The press has been seriously constrained. The chief justice of the Supreme Court and many other judges are believed to be under house arrest.

The United States, Britain and much of the West have always said the right things about democracy in Pakistan and around the world. I recall the words of President Bush in his second inaugural address when he said:”All who live in tyranny and hopelessness can know: the United States will not ignore your oppression, or excuse your oppressors. When you stand for your liberty, we will stand with you.”

The United States alone has given the Musharraf government more than $10 billion in aid since 2001. We do not know exactly where or how this money has been spent, but it is clear that it has not brought about the defeat of the Taliban and Al Qaeda, nor succeeded in capturing Osama bin Laden, nor has it broken the opium trade. It certainly has not succeeded in improving the quality of life of the children and families of Pakistan.

The United States can promote democracy : which is the only way to truly contain extremism and terrorism : by telling General Musharraf that it does not accept martial law, and that it expects him to conduct free, fair, impartial and internationally monitored elections within 60 days under a reconstituted election commission. He should be given that choice: democracy or dictatorship with isolation. …

Let me take this opportunity to offer an antagonistic eff you to anyone reading this who doubts that women are strong enough to lead.

–Ann Bartow

Share
This entry was posted in Feminism and Politics, Sisters In Other Nations. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to “It is dangerous to stand up to a military dictatorship, but more dangerous not to.”

  1. cyrachoudhury says:

    While many South Asian countries have had women leaders and there is no doubt that women are well able to lead, Benazir Bhutto, in my mind (along with the Bangladeshi leaders, Indira Gandhi and others) represents the fact that women can be just as prone to corruption and anti-democratic tendencies as men. Musharraf is no poster-child for democracy. Yet, it would be a mistake to believe that Bhutto is. We need only examine her tenure as PM.