Albany Law School
Ambedkar University Delhi
American University Washington College of Law
Arizona State University College of Law
Australian National University College of Law
Barry University School of Law
Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Birmingham City University School of Law
Birmingham Law School
Boston College Law School
Boston University School of Law
Brigham Young University School of Law
Bristol Law School
Brooklyn Law School
California Western School of Law
Case Western Reserve University
City University of New York
Cleveland State University College of Law
Columbia Law School
Cornell University Law School
Creighton University School of Law
Dalhousie University
DePaul University College of Law
Drake University Law School
Drexel University College of Law
Duke University School of Law
Durham Law School
Edinburgh Law School
Elon University School of Law
Emory University School of Law
Florida A&M University College of Law
Florida Coastal School of Law
Florida International University College of Law
Florida State University College of Law
Fordham Law School
George Washington University Law School
Georgetown University Law Center
Georgia State University College of Law
Golden Gate University School of Law
Gonzaga University School of Law
Hamline University School of Law
Harvard Law School
Hochschule Hannover Univeristy of Applied Sciences and Arts
Hofstra University School of Law
Howard University School of Law
Humbolt University Berlin Law Faculty
Hunter College Roosevelt Public Policy Institute
Illinois Institute of Technology Chicago-Kent College of Law
Indiana University Maurer School of Law
Indiana University School of Law - Indianapolis
John Marshall Law School
Keele University School and Department of Law
King's College London
La Trobe Law School
Lewis & Clark Law School
Louisiana State University Law Center
Loyola Law School Los Angeles
Loyola University Chicago School of Law
Loyola University New Orleans College of Law
Marquette University Law School
McGill University
Mercer University School of Law
Michigan State University College of Law
Mitchell Hamline School of Law
Monash University Faculty of Law
New England College of Law
New York Law School
New York University School of Law
Northeastern University School of Law
Northern Illinois University College of Law
Northwestern University School of Law
Nova Southeastern University Florida College of Law
O.P. Jindal University Global Law School
Occidental College
Ohio State University College of Law
Oklahoma City University School of Law
Osgoode Hall Law School York University
Pace Law School
- Alexander Greenawalt
- Audrey Rogers
- Barbara Atwell
- Bennett Gershman
- Bridget Crawford
- David Cassuto
- David Dorfman
- Don Doernberg
- Emily Waldman
- Gayl Westerman
- Horace Anderson
- Irene Johnson
- Janet Johnson
- Jeffrey Miller
- Jill Gross
- John Humbach
- Leslie Yalof Garfield
- Linda Fentiman
- Margaret Flint
- Marie Newman
- Michael Mushlin
- Michelle Simon
- Noa Ben-Asher
- Randolph McLaughlin
- S. David Cohen
- Shirley Lin
- Steven Goldberg
- Vanessa Merton
Pennsylvania State University
Pepperdine University School of Law
Princeton University
Queen Mary University of London
Queen's University Kingston
Rutgers Law School
Santa Clara University School of Law
Seattle University School of Law
Seton Hall University School of Law
Southern Methodist University School of Law
Southwestern Law School
St. John's University School of Law
St. Louis University School of Law
St. Mary's University School of Law
St. Thomas University School of Law
Stanford Law School
State University of New York at Buffalo
Stetson University College of Law
Suffolk University Law School
Syracuse University College of Law
Technorati
Tel Aviv University Buchmann Faculty of Law
Temple University Fox School of Business
Temple University School of Law
Texas A&M University School of Law
Texas Southern University School of Law
Texas Tech University School of Law
The University of Chicago
Thomas Cooley Law School
Thomas Jefferson School of Law
Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center
Tulane University Law School
Umeå University
Universidad de los Andes
University of Alabama School of Law
University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law
University of Arkansas
University of Arkansas at Little Rock School of Law
University of Baltimore School of Law
University of Bologna Law School
University of British Columbia Faculty of Law
University of California Berkeley
University of California College of the Law, San Francisco
University of California Davis School of Law
University of California Irvine School of Law
University of California Los Angeles
University of Cincinnati College of Law
University of Colorado School of Law
University of Connecticut School of Law
University of Dayton School of Law
University of Denver College of Law
University of Detroit Mercy School of Law
University of East Anglia Law School
University of Florida Levin College of Law
University of Georgia School of Law
University of Haifa
University of Hawai'i School of Law
University of Houston Law Center
University of Idaho College of Law
University of Illinois College of Law
University of Illinois Springfield Department of Legal Studies
University of Iowa College of Law
University of Kansas College of Arts & Sciences
University of Kansas School of Law
University of Kent Law School
University of Kentucky College of Law
University of La Verne College of Law
University of Leicester School of Law
University of Louisville School of Law
University of Maine School of Law
University of Manchester School of Law
University of Manitoba Faculty of Law
University of Maryland School of Law
University of Massachusetts Boston
University of Massachusetts School of Law
University of Miami School of Law
University of Michigan Law School
University of Minnesota Law School
University of Missouri-Kansas City
University of Montana School of Law
University of Nebraska College of Law
University of Nevada Las Vegas
University of New Hampshire School of Law
University of New Mexico School of Law
University of North Carolina School of Law
University of Oklahoma College of Law
University of Oregon School of Law
University of Ottawa Faculty of Law
University of Pennsylvania Law School
University of Pittsburgh School of Law
University of Puerto Rico School of Law
University of Queensland TC Beirne School of Law
University of Richmond School of Law
University of San Diego School of Law
University of San Francisco School of Law
University of Saskatchewan
University of South Carolina School of Law
University of South Dakota School of Law
University of Southern California Law School
University of Sunderland
University of Technology Sydney
University of Tennessee College of Law
University of Texas at Austin School of Law
University of the District of Columbia
University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law
University of Toledo College of Law
University of Toronto
University of Tulsa College of Law
University of Utah
University of Victoria Faculty of Law
University of Virginia School of Law
University of Washington School of Law
University of Wisconsin Law School
Vanderbilt University Law School
Vermont Law School
Villanova University School of Law
Wake Forest University School of Law
Warwick School of Law
Washburn University School of Law
Washington & Lee University School of Law
Washington University in St. Louis
Wayne State University Law School
West Virginia University College of Law
Western New England School of Law
Western State College of Law
Widener University Commonwealth Law School
Widener University Delaware Law School
Willamette University College of Law
William and Mary Law School
Yale Law School
Categories
Meta
- Log in
- Entries feed
- Comments feed
- WordPress.org Is Viagra available for sale in the U.S.?
Category Archives: Courts and the Judiciary
Gender Equality?
The gender of judging implicates constitutional as well as “rule of law” concerns. A new article, Judging Women,posted on ssrn has been garnering attention. The study comparing male and female judges provides an empirical perspective: “Primarily using a dataset … Continue reading
The Devil is in the Dictum: Second Circuit Makes Troubling Statements in Dictum in Rape Shield Ruling
A female employee allegedly flashes her breasts to co-workers at the workplace. That female employee later brings a sexual harassment action against her superior, claiming that he touched her thighs and breasts, offered her job security in return for sex, … Continue reading
Rape Shield Redux: Supreme Court of Nevada Finds Rule 26 Applies Where Rape Shield Law Doesn’t
Back in July, I posted an entry about an opinion by the Supreme Court of Alabama permitting discovery regarding a civil plaintiff’s sexual history because Alabama’s rape shield rule only applies to criminal cases. In that post, I argued that, … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary
Comments Off on Rape Shield Redux: Supreme Court of Nevada Finds Rule 26 Applies Where Rape Shield Law Doesn’t
No “Sex Plus” in the Seventh Circuit: Court Fails to Recognize “Sex Plus” Theory of Discrimination in Title VII Action Against Fire Department
A female firefighter has direct or circumstantial evidence that she was intentionally discriminated against based upon he gender. Undoubtedly, if she brings a Title VII action against the fire department, her action will survive a motion for summary judgment. But … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Employment Discrimination, Feminism and the Workplace
Comments Off on No “Sex Plus” in the Seventh Circuit: Court Fails to Recognize “Sex Plus” Theory of Discrimination in Title VII Action Against Fire Department
First names and judicial destiny for women, at least in South Carolina…
From the ABA Journal: Women lawyers with masculine-sounding first names have better odds of becoming a judge than their counterparts with feminine names, at least in South Carolina, according to a study by two economics researchers. The study finds that … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, Feminists in Academia, South Carolina
Comments Off on First names and judicial destiny for women, at least in South Carolina…
Why Gender Still Matters
Gender still matters, judging by events of recent months, such as President Obama establishing a White House Council on Women and Girls, to make sure that all federal agencies”take into account the particular needs and concerns of women and girls”and … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Sisters In Other Nations
Comments Off on Why Gender Still Matters
What Not to Wear, Religious Edition, Take 2: Supreme Court of Michigan Finalizes Attire Rule of Evidence, With Lawsuit to Follow
Back in June, I posted an entry about the Supreme Court of Michigan’s adoption of an amendment to Michigan Rule of Evidence 611 which provides as follows: (b) Appearance of Parties and Witnesses. The court shall exercise reasonable control over … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Religion
Comments Off on What Not to Wear, Religious Edition, Take 2: Supreme Court of Michigan Finalizes Attire Rule of Evidence, With Lawsuit to Follow
There’s Something About Marriage: New York Trial Court Uses Differences Between a Marriage and a Civil Union to Refuse to Dissolve the Latter
“Civil union” means that two eligible persons have established a relationship pursuant to this chapter, and may receive the benefits and protections and be subject to the responsibilities of spouses. -Vermont Stat. Ann., Title 15, Section 1201(2) (a) Parties to … Continue reading
The Portia Hypothesis for South Carolina Judges
Two Clemson economists have a new paper in the American Law and Economics Review (available here on Westlaw – sorry, I can’t find a free link to it) titled: Do Masculine Names Help Female Lawyers Become Judges? Evidence … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law
Comments Off on The Portia Hypothesis for South Carolina Judges
Two Wrongs Don’t Make it Right: Court of Appeals of Mississippi Drags Feet on Recognizing Combined Race-Gender Groups as Groups Deserving Discrete Protection Under Batson
In Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S.79 (1986), the Supreme Court declared that racial discrimination through the use of peremptory challenges is prohibited. In J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994), the Court found that gender discrimination through … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Courts and the Judiciary, Justice?, Race and Racism
Comments Off on Two Wrongs Don’t Make it Right: Court of Appeals of Mississippi Drags Feet on Recognizing Combined Race-Gender Groups as Groups Deserving Discrete Protection Under Batson
Judge Reportedly Questioned Whether Woman Was Raped Because She Was “On Top”
That’s the headline from this blog post, which reports that Texas State District Judge Kevin Fine, elected as a Democrat, is alleged to have told a rape victim in his court that he didn’t believe she was raped because she … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary
Comments Off on Judge Reportedly Questioned Whether Woman Was Raped Because She Was “On Top”
The Road to Hell is Paved With (Allegedly) Good Intentions: Supreme Court of Alabama Opinion Raises Important Rape Shield Questions
We are not unmindful of the very personal nature of the information sought from Carlisle regarding her past conduct. Nor do we intend to suggest that a plaintiff with a promiscuous past could not feel the same shame and humiliation … Continue reading
California’s Rejection of the Reasonable Battered Woman Standard: Is it Based Upon an Objectionable and Offensive Straw Man?
In its recent opinion in Jefferson v. Kernan, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California referenced the opinion of the California Supreme Court in People v. Humphrey, 921 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1996). In Humphrey, a wife … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Courts and the Judiciary
1 Comment
Judge Kozinski Will Not Be Sanctioned For Hosting Web Site Featuring Racist, Degrading Porn
The SF Chron reported (in part): … In a decision that it labeled an admonishment, the panel told Kozinski that his conduct “created a public controversy that can reasonably be seen as having resulted in embarrassment to the institution of … Continue reading
Posted in Coerced Sex, Courts and the Judiciary, Justice?
Comments Off on Judge Kozinski Will Not Be Sanctioned For Hosting Web Site Featuring Racist, Degrading Porn
Gendered Qualification for Public Office
Should Middle-Aged Men Hold Public Office? That’s the title of an engaging essay by Barbara O’Brien over at salon.com here. O’Brien not only answers those who have wondered aloud about Sotomayor’s qualifications given possibilities such as menstruation and menopause, but … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Politics, South Carolina
Comments Off on Gendered Qualification for Public Office
Rihanna and the (Un?)Constitutionality of the Mutual Stay Away Order
Can anyone out there explain the constitutionality of the Chris Brown plea deal? Brown pleaded guilty to one count of felony assault based upon his attack of Rihanna, and he got five years of probation and community labor. The judge … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Courts and the Judiciary
11 Comments
Landmark Domestic Violence Judgment by European Court of Human Rights
In a landmark decision, the European Court of Human Rights has unanimously found that a state violated the human rights of the applicant and her mother in failing to protect them against domestic violence. In Opuz v Turkey, the applicant … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, Sisters In Other Nations
Comments Off on Landmark Domestic Violence Judgment by European Court of Human Rights
What Not To Wear, Religious Edition: Supreme Court of Michigan Adopts Rule Allowing Judges to Exercise “Reasonable Control Over the Appearance of Parties and Witnesses” Based Upon Niqab Case
Yesterday, by a 5-2 vote, the Supreme Court of Michigan adopted an amendment to Michigan Rule of Evidence 611. This amendment created Michigan Rule of Evidence 611(b), which provides as follows: (b) Appearance of Parties and Witnesses. The court shall … Continue reading
Who”Owns”the Marriage Equality Issue?
The last several weeks have been busy ones in the battle for marriage equality. The governors of Maine and New Hampshire signed laws that allowed same sex couples to marry. California’s Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Proposition 8, and … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Families, Feminism and Politics
Comments Off on Who”Owns”the Marriage Equality Issue?
Web Resource for Information on Judge Sotomayor
The Library of Congress has created a web page (here) that contains links to Judge Sotomayor’s published law review articles, transcripts from her two prior confirmation hearings and a searchable database of Second Circuit opinions. -Bridget Crawford
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary
1 Comment
Beyond The Scope (But Not): Court Finds That Supervisor’s Sexist Statements Qualify As Employee Admissions
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(D) states Admission by party-opponent. [A] statement is not hearsay if…[t]he statement is offered against a party and is…a statement by the party’s agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and the Workplace
Comments Off on Beyond The Scope (But Not): Court Finds That Supervisor’s Sexist Statements Qualify As Employee Admissions
Sonia Sotomayor’s Personal History: Why It Matters
There has been much made of Sonia Sotomayor’s life, her Puerto Rican background, her modest, if not poor, childhood, her mother, what her Latina-ness means to her, her involvement in civil rights organizations, etc. It’s both a big part … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, Firsts, Law Schools, Legal Profession, Race and Racism
Comments Off on Sonia Sotomayor’s Personal History: Why It Matters
You can’t make this stuff up–G. Gordon Liddy on Sotomayor
G. Gordon Liddy’s take on Judge Sotomayor–including his fear for the country should she deliberate while menstruating– here. –Leigh Goodmark
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary
3 Comments
Just When You Thought They Couldn’t Be Stupider–Tancredo on Sotomayor and La Raza
Apparently, Tom Tancredo was disappointed that he hadn’t thought up the criticism about Judge Sotomayor’s love for Puerto Rican food, and went one better, referring to the National Council of La Raza as the KKK without nooses or hoods. See … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary
1 Comment
Of Pigs’ Feet and Precedent…
Will Judge Sotomayor’s love of Puerto Rican food cause her to rule against white, male firefighters (for instance)? Thoughts from the increasingly desperate Republican party here. –Leigh Goodmark
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary
3 Comments
More About Barnes v. Yahoo
I blogged about the case previously here. Below is an excerpt from the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Barnes v. Yahoo at page 5316 that gives a quick overview of the facts: In accordance with Yahoo policy, Barnes mailed Yahoo a … Continue reading
That Sotomayor Quote
Taken from Sotomayor’s Judge Mario G. Olmos Memorial Lecture in 2001, which she delivered at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, here is the context: … Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences, a possibility … Continue reading
Would Obama Have Hugged A Male SCOTUS Nominee Like This?
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Politics
Comments Off on Would Obama Have Hugged A Male SCOTUS Nominee Like This?
Strauss v. Horton
Read the opinion here. Feminist efforts to sort out what it all means can be found: Here at Tennessee Guerilla Women; Here at the Gender and Sexuality Law Blog; (additional links to come). See also the Linkfarm at … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, LGBT Rights
Comments Off on Strauss v. Horton
Comic Relief
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Culture
Comments Off on Comic Relief
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury: The Role of the “Child Care Exception” in the Development of the Right of Women to Serve as Jurors
In its recent opinion in State v. Schmeiderer, 2009 WL 961787 (Tenn.Crim.App. 2009), the Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee rejected a convicted murder’s appeal, in which he had claimed, inter alia, that “the trial court systematically excluded women from … Continue reading
Darren Hutchinson Takes Down Jeffrey Rosen’s Article About Judge Sonia Sotomayor
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Law, Feminism and Politics, Race and Racism, The Underrepresentation of Women
Comments Off on Darren Hutchinson Takes Down Jeffrey Rosen’s Article About Judge Sonia Sotomayor
Delaware Chief Judge emails “soft porn” to former clerks
Myron Steele, Chief Judge of the Delaware, is reported here to have used his government email account to forward a “suggestive video” which “depicts a professional-looking young woman in a bar competing with a glamorous blonde for the attention of … Continue reading
Posted in Academia, Courts and the Judiciary, Justice?, Legal Profession
1 Comment
Differently Abled?: Court Identifies Circuit Split Over Who is Similarly Situated to a Pregnancy Discrimination Act Plaintiff
The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Woodard v. Rest Haven Christian Services, 2009 703270 (N.D. Ill. 2009), acknowledged but did not resolve an interesting circuit split on the following issue: … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and the Workplace
Comments Off on Differently Abled?: Court Identifies Circuit Split Over Who is Similarly Situated to a Pregnancy Discrimination Act Plaintiff
“This job is easy for people who’ve never done it,”Justice Thomas said later.”What I have found in this job is they know more about it than I do, especially if they have the title, law professor.”
Posted in Academia, Courts and the Judiciary, Law Teaching
Comments Off on “This job is easy for people who’ve never done it,”Justice Thomas said later.”What I have found in this job is they know more about it than I do, especially if they have the title, law professor.”
Judicial Flubber?: First Circuit Seemingly Repudiates Supreme Court Sex-Stereotyping Precedent In Sex Discrimination Appeal
When the Supreme Court replaced the relatively simple Frye test with the relatively complicated Daubert test for determining the admissibility of expert opinion testimony, many critics (correctly) groused that science-starved judges would not be able to rise to the task … Continue reading
Not Very Discriminating?: Court of Appeals Of Michigan Erroneously Affirms Summary Judgment Order In Employment Discrimination/Retaliation Appeal
The recent opinion of the Court of Appeals of Michigan in Syrowatka v. County of Washtenaw, 2009 WL 529213 (Mich.App. 2009), affirmed a trial court order granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims for employment discrimination … Continue reading
We, The Jury: Why Aren’t There Jury Impeachment Appeals Alleging Juror Sexism?
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) precludes jurors from impeaching their verdicts after trial through testimony concerning anything internal to the jury deliberation process. Accordingly, jurors can’t invalidate their verdicts by testifying after trial that jurors (a) misunderstood jury instructions (even … Continue reading
National Network to End Domestic Violence Praises Landmark Supreme Court Decision
From the FLP mailbox, a press release from the National Network to End Domestic Violence, exerpted here: Advocates against domestic violence today applauded the U.S. Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision to uphold the federal Lautenberg Amendment that bans convicted domestic violence … Continue reading
Posted in Acts of Violence, Courts and the Judiciary, Feminism and Families, Feminism and Law
Comments Off on National Network to End Domestic Violence Praises Landmark Supreme Court Decision
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Saturday Evening Review
This week’s Saturday Evening Review centers on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, returning to the Court this week after surgery. As Robert Barnes reported for the Washington Post on Tuesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg returned to the Supreme Court bench … Continue reading
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Firsts
1 Comment