Tulsa Football Depth Chart, Solid Argon Or Liquid Argon Has The Greater Density, Recent Companies To Join Halfords, Columbus Zoo Arctic Fox Anana Death, Abandoned School Marion Ohio, Articles P

.020 Carrying concealed deadly weapon. Mantooth v. State, 335 Ga. App. - Because the defendant presented sufficient evidence to show that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to stipulate to the defendant's felon status or to obtain a jury charge limiting the jury's consideration of the defendant's criminal history, such failures prejudiced the defendant's defense sufficiently to require a new trial on a charge of aggravated assault; however, given the defendant's admission to possessing a gun at the time of the altercation, no prejudice resulted to warrant reversal and a new trial on the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon conviction. Although the trial court might not have been presented with evidence that the defendant was in physical possession of a firearm during the hijacking of the victim's car, because the evidence that was presented authorized a finding that the defendant was a party to that crime, and that all those involved were joint conspirators, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant a new trial on grounds that the indictment charging possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony was at fatal variance with the proof presented at trial. - Because the defendant had completed a three-year first-offender probationary sentence and had been discharged without court adjudication of guilt pursuant to O.C.G.A. State may convict and punish for burglary and for unlawful possession of firearm by a previously convicted felon, when the firearm was taken in the burglary. The four victims were found dead in two hotel rooms from gunshot wounds to the back of their heads; identification documents belonging to the four victims were found in the defendant's car; there was expert testimony that the defendant's gun had been used to kill the victims; the defendant's baseball cap contained one victim's deoxyribonucleic acid; there was evidence that the defendant and two friends used three victims' tickets to attend a football game after the victims were murdered; the defendant was identified as being in an elevator with one victim; the defendant was seen leaving the hotel with one victim's cooler; and a duffle bag belonging to one victim was in the defendant's car when the defendant was arrested on weapons charges. 444, 313 S.E.2d 144 (1984). WebAny person prohibited from possessing, transporting, or carrying a firearm, ammunition for a firearm, or a stun weapon under subsection A may petition the circuit court of the jurisdiction in which he resides or, if the person is not a resident of the Commonwealth, the circuit court of any county or city where such person was last convicted of a 10, 424 S.E.2d 310 (1992). This crime is categorized as a third-degree felony. WebThe punishment for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is significant. 2d 213 (1984). - Testimony by a ballistics expert proving the operability of the firearm is not required for conviction under O.C.G.A. (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Felony" means any offense 16-3-21 and16-11-138, then it could not be said that the defendant was committing a felony when the defendant shot the victim, and the preclusive bar of 16-3-21(b)(2) would not apply. 3d Art. State v. Langlands, 276 Ga. 721, 583 S.E.2d 18 (2003). Fact that weapon was acquired for self-defense or to prevent its use against defendant as defense in prosecution for violation of state statute prohibiting persons under indictment for, or convicted of, crime from acquiring, having, carrying, or using firearms or weapons, 39 A.L.R.4th 967. 314, 387 S.E.2d 602 (1989); 123 A.L.R. 3d Art. 474, 646 S.E.2d 695 (2007). Ledesma v. State, 251 Ga. 487, 306 S.E.2d 629 (1983), cert. 523, 359 S.E.2d 416 (1987). 16-3-24.2. Johnson v. State, 282 Ga. 235, 647 S.E.2d 48 (2007). Cited in Robinson v. State, 159 Ga. App. An individual accused of robbery takes property belonging to another with the intent to deprive the owner of their possession. 310, 520 S.E.2d 466 (1999). Bryant v. State, 169 Ga. App. 2d 50 (2007). Culpepper v. State, 312 Ga. App. 16-11-131 any offense with a maximum sentence exceeding 12 months, even those denominated "misdemeanor" by the rendering jurisdiction; section was held partly unconstitutional in that it failed to give sufficient notice as to what out-of-state convictions could be used in support of the charge. 324(a), 44 A.L.R. 16-11-131(b) and (c) is to implicitly repeal O.C.G.A. 16-11-131(b) is possession of a single firearm, and the defendant could be separately punished for possession of each of the firearms seized from the defendant's house; thus, the trial court committed no error in declining to merge the defendant's four firearm-related convictions for purposes of sentencing. Sufficiency of evidence as to nature of firearm in prosecution under state statute prohibiting persons under indictment for, or convicted of, crime from acquiring, having, carrying, or using firearms, 37 A.L.R.4th 1179. denied, 129 S. Ct. 481, 172 L. Ed. There was sufficient evidence to support a defendant's burglary conviction as it was within the province of the jury to believe the testimony of the owner of the burglarized home, who was a police officer, and the testimony of a detective, regardless if the owner's trial testimony contradicted a prior written statement. What constitutes actual or constructive possession of unregistered or otherwise prohibited firearm in violation of 26 USCS 5861, 133 A.L.R. Johnson v. State, 308 Ga. 141, 839 S.E.2d 521 (2020). 2d 213 (1984). Const., amend. Ledesma v. State, 251 Ga. 487, 306 S.E.2d 629 (1983), cert. I, Sec. Davis v. State, 280 Ga. 442, 629 S.E.2d 238 (2006). 1. - It could not be presumed that defendant, as owner and head of a household, owned or possessed the firearms found therein during a search for drugs, where there was no other evidence to show that defendant owned or possessed the firearms; the evidence was not sufficient to support defendant's conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. 580, 305 S.E.2d 29 (1983); Brown v. State, 168 Ga. App. ATF investigated the case along with Alabama Law Enforcement Agency and several other local law enforcement agencies, which Assistant U.S. Attorney Robert J. Becher, Sr. is prosecuting. 657, 350 S.E.2d 302 (1986). 24-5-506) to try a firearms possession charge, which required evidence of a prior felony conviction, together with a marijuana and a burglary charge. Validity of state gun control legislation under state constitutional provisions securing right to bear arms - convicted felons, 85 A.L.R.6th 641. 481, 657 S.E.2d 533 (2008), cert. Walker v. State, 281 Ga. 157, 635 S.E.2d 740 (2006), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1019, 126 S. Ct. 656, 163 L. Ed. - Conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon could not stand because the same prior conviction could not support both recidivist sentencing and a conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and also a nolo contendere plea could not serve as proof of a prior conviction for a charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; the prior conviction remained available to support enhanced sentencing as a recidivist, however. 618, 829 S.E.2d 820 (2019). Tanner v. State, 259 Ga. App. Edmunds v. Cowan, 192 Ga. App. 16-5-3(a), a killing resulting from an unlawful act other than a felony. Ziegler v. State, 270 Ga. App. Jury was authorized to find that guns found in defendant's automobile were actual working firearms since there was no evidence introduced to refute a police officer's testimony that the guns were pistols. 1986 Op. 76, 635 S.E.2d 380 (2006). 537, 309 S.E.2d 683 (1983). Convictions for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony did not merge, where one crime was not "included" in the other, and each involved proof of distinct essential elements. Lawson v. State, 280 Ga. 881, 635 S.E.2d 134 (2006). 127, 386 S.E.2d 868 (1989), cert. Robinson v. State, 281 Ga. App. Layne v. State, 313 Ga. App. Defendant's prior felony conviction for armed robbery is properly admitted where it is the basis for the charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. 16-11-129(b)(3)). denied, 552 U.S. 833, 128 S. Ct. 60, 169 L. Ed. 324, 316 S.E.2d 791, rev'd on other grounds, 253 Ga. 429, 322 S.E.2d 228 (1984), overruled in part by Ross v. State, 279 Ga. 365, 614 S.E.2d 31 (2005). 1983, Art. Fed. 852, 350 S.E.2d 835 (1986); Marshall v. State, 193 Ga. App. O.C.G.A. 3, 635 S.E.2d 270 (2006). 783, 653 S.E.2d 107 (2007). denied, 190 Ga. App. WEAPONS AND FIREARMS. 17-10-7 were valid. Driscoll v. State, 295 Ga. App. denied, No. Biggers v. State, 162 Ga. App. 290 (2012). The same restriction does not apply for long guns like rifles and shotguns. Alvin v. State, 287 Ga. App. 94, 576 S.E.2d 71 (2003). Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under O.C.G.A. 1980 Op. Fed. Davis v. State, 287 Ga. App. Unlawful Possession of a Firearm by Convicted Felon in Collin County, Texas. - Because defendant's three prior felony convictions, and a subsequent conviction of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon as a result of one or more of those felonies, remained separate felonies that could be used to impose a recidivist punishment for the commission of yet another felony, and defendant did not seek to collaterally attack any of those convictions, the recidivists sentences imposed under O.C.G.A. O.C.G.A. denied, No. 178, 786 S.E.2d 558 (2016). Defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, based upon defendant's and an accomplice's robbing a store at gunpoint, was affirmed because the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction as latent fingerprints, which belonged to defendant, that were found in the car used in the armed robbery sufficiently corroborated the testimony of the accomplice who identified defendant as the driver of the car before the accomplice recanted the accomplice's custodial statement at trial. 734, 783 S.E.2d 133 (2016). Starling v. State, 285 Ga. App. If you are convicted, you will face up to 10 years in 16-11-131 is a reasonable regulation authorized by the police power and thus is not violative of Ga. Const. 604, 327 S.E.2d 566 (1985). 764, 315 S.E.2d 257 (1984). Harris v. State, 283 Ga. App. WebGeorgia Code 16-11-131. 21-6304. King v. State, 169 Ga. App. WebThe 2022 Florida Statutes (including 2022 Special Session A and 2023 Special Session B) Title XLVI. 16-5-2, felony murder predicated on possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of O.C.G.A. Up to fifteen (15) years of probation. A judgment of conviction for transporting a stolen motor vehicle in interstate or foreign commerce or for committing or Parramore v. State, 277 Ga. App. After the appellant was found guilty of criminal damage to property, kidnapping, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, evidence of the appellant's prior felony conviction for voluntary manslaughter was clearly admissible since the state's evidence proving the appellant's prior conviction contained references not only to voluntary manslaughter, as alleged in the indictment, but also to charges of murder and aggravated assault. 106, 739 S.E.2d 395 (2013); Ferguson v. Perry, 292 Ga. 666, 740 S.E.2d 598 (2013); Vann v. State, 322 Ga. App. Coursey v. State, 196 Ga. App. - Defendant was not entitled to a new jury on a trial of a possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charge as, generally, all charges arising out of the same conduct had to be tried in a single prosecution; although there were limited exceptions to the rule allowing, under proper circumstances, the bifurcation of a possession of a firearm by a convicted felon charge, the defendant was not entitled to a separate trial before a new jury on that charge. - Defendant's charge of possession of a firearm by a felon, on which a charge of felony murder was predicated, was based on defendant's Pennsylvania misdemeanor conviction for involuntary manslaughter, which carried a maximum five-year sentence. - For annual survey of criminal law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. Article 63. Davis v. State, 325 Ga. App. 16-11-131(b), the defendant was not entitled to a jury instruction on involuntary manslaughter under O.C.G.A. Merely having once been sentenced to a term of probation as a first offender is not an element of the crime defined in O.C.G.A. 15, 443 S.E.2d 662 (1994); Willis v. State, 214 Ga. App. 16-11-131, criminalizing a felon's firearm possession, gave insufficient notice to defendant that the Pennsylvania misdemeanor could be a predicate felony for a charge under the statute. .030 Defacing a firearm. 16-3-21(a) and16-11-138 in combination effectively provide this rule of law: A person is justified in threatening or using force against another, or in possessing a weapon in circumstances otherwise prohibited under the Code, when and to the extent that he or she reasonably believes that such threat or force or conduct otherwise prohibited is necessary to defend himself or herself or a third person against such other's imminent use of unlawful force. Evidence supported the defendant's convictions for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, armed robbery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. Finley v. State, 286 Ga. 47, 685 S.E.2d 258 (2009). 16-5-21(a)(2), possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, O.C.G.A. 86-4. 215, 522 S.E.2d 506 (1999); Green v. State, 244 Ga. App. 3d Art. Because sufficient direct and circumstantial evidence showed that the defendant, a prior felon wielding a weapon, engaged in a fight with the two victims, fatally wounding one and shooting the other in the arm, and thereafter fled from police, the defendant's convictions for involuntary manslaughter, reckless conduct, fleeing and eluding, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon were upheld on appeal. The law says guns are forbidden for those convicted of crimes that attract prison terms exceeding a year. S08C0978, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 508 (Ga. 2008). Major v. State, 280 Ga. 746, 632 S.E.2d 661 (2006). - See Murray v. State, 180 Ga. App. State v. Mills, 268 Ga. 873, 495 S.E.2d 1 (1998). Martin v. State, 281 Ga. 778, 642 S.E.2d 837 (2007). As used in this Code section, the term "forcible felony" means any felony which involves the use or threat of physical force or violence against any person and further includes, without limitation, murder; murder in the second degree; burglary in any degree; robbery; armed robbery; home invasion in any degree; kidnapping; hijacking of an aircraft or hijacking a motor vehicle in the first degree; aggravated stalking; rape; aggravated child molestation; aggravated sexual battery; arson in the first degree; the manufacturing, transporting, distribution, or possession of explosives with intent to kill, injure, or intimidate individuals or destroy a public building; terroristic threats; or acts of treason or insurrection. 16-11-131 punishes a discrete crime and subjects a defendant to neither double jeopardy nor multiple prosecutions for the same offense. 3d Art. Up to $10,000 in fines. 1976, Art. 16-11-131. - Prior felony conviction under O.C.G.A. Fed. Evidence was sufficient to convict the defendant of burglary, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of the aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon because a house-sitter returned to a residence to discover an intruder inside; the intruder flashed a gun and told the house-sitter that the intruder would shoot the house-sitter; the house-sitter identified the defendant, whom the house-sitter had known for over 20 years, as the intruder; and a back window of the home had been shattered. Georgia may have more current or accurate information. Anderson v. State, 285 Ga. 496, 678 S.E.2d 84 (2009). 17-10-7. Thomas v. State, 305 Ga. App. 16-11-131(c) mandating the granting of a pardon. Defendant waived defendant's objection to the trial court's consideration of a particular conviction in aggravation of sentencing under the recidivist statute, O.C.G.A. 16-11-131 merged with the defendant's conviction of felony murder under O.C.G.A. Little v. State, 195 Ga. App. denied, 552 U.S. 833, 128 S. Ct. 60, 169 L. Ed. 559, 802 S.E.2d 19 (2017). Unlawful use or possession of weapons by felons or persons in the custody of the Department of Corrections facilities. 16-11-131; two witnesses testified that the defendant had told the witnesses that the defendant shot the victim, and one of the witnesses testified that the defendant stated that the shooting occurred during a robbery, the defendant discarded a gun that was later found to be the murder weapon while fleeing police on another crime, and the defendant admitted to police that the murder weapon was the defendant's, that the defendant stole $100 from the victims, and that the defendant shot the murder victim. Adoption, Rejection, and Use of "Receipt of Benefits" Test Under 11 U.S.C.A. There are nearly 22 million guns owned in the Lone Possession of firearms by convicted felons and first offender probationers (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Felony" means any offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or more and includes conviction by a court-martial - With regard to a defendant's convictions on two counts of armed robbery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, failure to obey a traffic control device, fleeing and attempting to elude a police officer, reckless driving, failure to stop at the scene of an accident, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, the trial court properly denied the defendant's motion for a new trial and sufficient evidence existed to support the defendant's convictions as the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence certain bullets found in the defendant's possession at the time of the defendant's arrest based on the state allegedly not providing a proper chain of custody; the bullets, unlike fungible articles, were distinct and recognizable physical objects that were identifiable by observation, eliminating the necessity of a chain-of-custody showing. 6. Extradition Treaties Between United States of America and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - United States and United Kingdom Cases, 45 A.L.R. 627, 636 S.E.2d 779 (2006). Trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to bifurcate and separately try the count for being a felon in possession of a firearm because bifurcation was not authorized when the charge of being a felon in possession served as the underlying felony for felony murder. 3d Art. (Code 1933, 26-2914, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1509, 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1171, 2; Ga. L. 1983, p. 945, 1; Ga. L. 1987, p. 476, 1, 2; Ga. L. 1989, p. 14, 16; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1630, 5; Ga. L. 2012, p. 899, 8-5/HB 1176; Ga. L. 2014, p. 426, 4/HB 770; Ga. L. 2014, p. 444, 2-5/HB 271; Ga. L. 2016, p. 443, 6C-2/SB 367; Ga. L. 2017, p. 417, 3-1/SB 104; Ga. L. 2018, p. 550, 4-4/SB 407.). 770, 728 S.E.2d 286 (2012). 16-11-131(b). 7, 806 S.E.2d 302 (2017). - Evidence supported the defendant's contention that the defendant shot the victim in self-defense; therefore, if the defendant's possession of a firearm at the shooting was justified under the rule created under O.C.G.A. 899, 379 S.E.2d 199 (1989); Clark v. State, 206 Ga. App. 16-11-131(b); the crime is committed when one who is currently on probation as a first offender possesses a firearm. 918, 368 S.E.2d 771 (1988); Spivey v. State, 193 Ga. App. 137, 570 S.E.2d 424 (2002); Herring v. State, 277 Ga. 317, 588 S.E.2d 711 (2003); Thornton v. State, 288 Ga. App. Varner v. State, 306 Ga. 726, 832 S.E.2d 792 (2019). The offenses charged were separate and distinct and there was no merger; evidence used to establish the burglary was not again used to establish the later crime of possession of a weapon by a convicted felon. 16-11-131's definition of a firearm does not include toys or nonfunctional replicas, and whether a pistol is a firearm is a matter to be determined by the jury. For article on the 2012 amendment of this Code section, see 29 Ga. St. U.L. Roper v. State, 281 Ga. 878, 644 S.E.2d 120 (2007). Web10.15 (a) Possession Of [A Firearm] [An Electric Weapon or Device] [Ammunition] [Or] [Carrying a Concealed Weapon] by a Person Under the Age of 24 Who Has Been Found Delinquent of an Offense that would be a Felony if Committed by an Adult 790.23 (1) (b) or (1) (d), Fla. Stat. WebPossession of Firearm by a Convicted Felon or First Offender Probationer. Possession of 16-11-131, the trial court properly dismissed the charge. WebThe suspect was a convicted felon who was not allowed to possess a firearm and was currently out on bond for Assault Against a Family Member. 601, 462 S.E.2d 648 (1995). McTaggart v. State, 285 Ga. App. 16-11-131, since the violation of that statute was an other crime not shown to be connected with the one on trial, served no useful or relevant purpose, placed the defendant's character in evidence, and was prejudicial to the defendant. V (see now Ga. Const. Thompson v. State, 168 Ga. App. 16-11-131(b) was found ambiguous and permitted only one prosecution and conviction for the simultaneous possession of multiple firearms. WebSPRINGFIELD, Ill. A federal jury returned a guilty verdict on February 22, 2023, against Aaron Jackson, 30, of Springfield, Ill. for knowingly possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. See OCGA 16-11-131 (b). Application of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Antisegmentation Principle to Dredge or Fill Projects, 45 A.L.R. The plea to carrying a concealed weapon, a misdemeanor, was not an element of the current charge of the possession of a firearm by a first offender probationer under O.C.G.A. 178, 786 S.E.2d 558 (2016). 197, 626 S.E.2d 169 (2006). 901, 386 S.E.2d 39 (1989). WebAs convicted felons, Frazier and Stalsby are prohibited by federal law from owning or possessing firearms or ammunition. Fed. S08C0978, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 508 (Ga. 2008). 16-11-131; because the possession count was a predicate offense for the felony murder count, the prior conviction that was admitted into evidence was relevant to the felony murder count, and it was not necessary to sever the possession count. - Because the only evidence before the jury regarding the defendant's status as a convicted felon was the entry of a guilty plea to a crime that could have been either a felony or a misdemeanor, the evidence failed to provide the jury with a sufficient basis for finding that element beyond a reasonable doubt; consequently, the defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon had to be reversed. - Firearms found in the defendant's girlfriend's room, occupied by the defendant and defendant's girlfriend at the time of arrest, were properly admitted as being relevant to prove the necessary elements of O.C.G.A. 618, 829 S.E.2d 820 (2019). Criminal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. 448, 352 S.E.2d 642 (1987). McKee v. State, 280 Ga. 755, 632 S.E.2d 636 (2006). - Trial counsel was ineffective in failing to seek to redact the portion of a defendant's first offender plea that related to carrying a concealed weapon. Hinton v. State, 297 Ga. App. Evidence was sufficient to find the defendant guilty of voluntary manslaughter in violation of O.C.G.A. 640, 448 S.E.2d 745 (1994). WebNORFOLK, Va. An Isle of Wight man was sentenced today to 81 months in prison for being a convicted felon in possession of firearms and ammunition. - Georgia Supreme Court held that the phrase any firearm, as used in O.C.G.A. in a residential area and the defendant's attempt to flee on foot; a backpack that the defendant was carrying while running from the police and which was recovered from the roof of the house around which the defendant had disappeared had drugs and a pistol in the backpack. 115, 717 S.E.2d 698 (2011). S09C0986, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 341 (Ga. 2009). Hicks v. State, 287 Ga. App. When a convicted felon is in possession of a sawed-off shotgun, two separate and distinct crimes are being committed, because a prohibited person is in possession of a prohibited weapon. Scott v. State, 190 Ga. App. 372, 626 S.E.2d 567 (2006). 6 for failure to request a bifurcated trial on felony murder under O.C.G.A. 637, 832 S.E.2d 453 (2019). Sufficient evidence supported the defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon based on the gun being found in close physical proximity to the defendant and that the defendant had in a pocket the exact number of the proper caliber bullets to completely reload the gun; although others had access to the car before the defendant took possession of the car, the evidence authorized the conclusion that the car had been visually inspected at a point close in time to when the defendant had sole access. 3d Art. denied, 552 U.S. 833, 128 S. Ct. 60, 169 L. Ed. - Evidence was insufficient to convict the defendant of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon because the defendant's name did not appear on the lease for the apartment and there was no evidence that the defendant had any clothing or personal items at the apartment; the only evidence linking the defendant to the gun, other than the defendant's proximity to it, was the discovery of paperwork bearing the defendant's name in a closet of the apartment; and that circumstantial evidence did not provide a link between the defendant and the gun, nor did it exclude the possibility that the gun belonged to others present in the apartment - such as the other individual detained in the bedroom or those individuals found in the living room. Davis v. State, 287 Ga. App. Brantley v. State, 272 Ga. 892, 536 S.E.2d 509 (2000). 16-11-131 or in refusing to charge sudden emergency, specific intent, or O.C.G.A. You're all set! 614, 340 S.E.2d 256 (1986). Wells v. State, 281 Ga. 253, 637 S.E.2d 8 (2006). Web- Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon does not merge with act of shooting the firearm; therefore, a jury may find a convicted felon guilty of felony murder by treating the Please check official sources. 105, 650 S.E.2d 767 (2007). 17-10-7, when the state had already used that conviction in support of the charge of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon because the defendant failed to object at sentencing to the exhibit containing the conviction. - In a prosecution for violation of O.C.G.A. 2d 50 (2007). 16-5-1, two counts of aggravated assault in violation of O.C.G.A. 16-11-131 as the state was not required to prove that the gun was operational at the time the defendant possessed the gun. 42, 520 S.E.2d 746 (1999); Evans v. State, 240 Ga. App. 323, 504 S.E.2d 19 (1998); Adams v. State, 239 Ga. App. Const., amend. "Firearm" includes any handgun, rifle, shotgun, or other weapon which will or can be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or electrical charge. 911, 386 S.E.2d 868 (1989); Black v. State, 261 Ga. 791, 410 S.E.2d 740 (1991), cert. Since the defendant's first-offender probation expired prior to the date on which the defendant was alleged to have possessed a firearm and the state presented no evidence that the defendant possessed a firearm during the term of probation and prior to the defendant's discharge, the defendant's conviction for possession of a firearm by a first-offender probationer had to be reversed. O.C.G.A. Johnson v. State, 279 Ga. App. Testimony provided by two accomplices, together with inside information wherein defendant learned about the location of the robbery, the security camera on the premises, the people that worked there, how many people worked there, who was in the back area, and about the safe, when coupled with the fact that the gunman was not captured on the security camera, provided some evidence, though slight, that the robber had such inside information; under the circumstances, the accomplices' testimony was sufficiently corroborated, and the jury was authorized to find defendant guilty of armed robbery, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. - O.C.G.A. Mar. S10P1859, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 267 (Ga. 2011). denied, 506 U.S. 839, 113 S. Ct. 118, 121 L. Ed. 379, 494 S.E.2d 100 (1997); Crawford v. State, 233 Ga. App. 572, 754 S.E.2d 151 (2014).