The reviewers only make recommendations. Additionally, for help with writing to the journal, you may find this handbook useful: How to communicate with the journal? and if it is not clarified on the . Their role is to. ensure that the paper is at the length specified by the manuscript editor (including number of figures). Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? In all cases, authors are expected to abide by the Nature Research press and embargo policies. Is it possible to create a concave light? Once your manuscript passes the initial quality check, we assign it to a member of Editorial Board, who is an active researcher in your field. Welcome to the Northern Ireland Assembly web site, which was set up to inform interested viewers of the day-to-day business and historical background of devolved Government in Northern Ireland. For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. How do I get published in Nature or Science? Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. Short answer: the editor will continue to try and find other suitable reviewers, sending them invitations and waiting for replies. A vital, and often overlooked, aspect of peer review is that in the current system, peer reviewers are normally not paid for their work. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the decision on manuscript acceptance depends on several factors, such as availability and responsiveness of peer reviewers and the extent of revisions recommended. What does it mean if the status is 'under consideration' for two weeks? resubmitnoveltyresubmit, 4. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? Its been more than 2 months since I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Manuscripts should be submitted via our online manuscript submission system. This, in turn, means that the status Awaiting decision refers to the decision that the editor will take about whether your paper will be sent for peer review or desk rejected. Determine why this decision will make a difference to your customers or fellow employees. Thank you for visiting nature.com. What does Enterococcus faecalis look like. So in conclusion, yes, editors can add reviews but should do so with extreme caution and rarity. Special care is given to papers whose authors native language is not English, and special attention is given to summary paragraphs. Most journals typically take around 4-12 weeks to share their final decision. b. Editors reject manuscripts at this stage for one or more technical reasons: The manuscript is missing essential elements or sections required by the journal. LetPub Scientific Journal Selector (2018-2021), Nature Energy published in 2016, UNITED STATES. Nat Neurosci 5, 917 (2002). I was shocked and disappointed by your rejection letter, authors write, hundreds of times each year, I must ask that you reconsider your decision. Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience, for example, has turned away over 6000 manuscripts, roughly 90% of all submissions. My code is GPL licensed, can I issue a license to have my code be distributed in a specific MIT licensed project. How long do editor decisions take at Science/Nature? Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. Finally, despite persistent beliefs to the contrary, we do not base our decisions on the reputations of the authors or their friends, and so we do not respond favorably to 'celebrity endorsements' or statements about authors' previous track records. Authors are provided the opportunity to opt out of this scheme at the completion of the peer review process, before the paper is accepted. Can we write a courteous mail asking about the status change from 'Decision Made' to 'Under Consideration'? We do our best to insure a fair and consistent process for all authors, but procedural concerns must be balanced against our obligation to maintain, and if possible raise, the journal's overall standards. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. //--> What does editor decision started mean nature? //--> . Share. [CDATA[> At this point, you realize you've reached the end of the email, thus eliminating the possibility that some subsequent paragraph will say, "However, today is Opposite Day.". Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. Yes, its appropriate. What does a quick change from 'Under consideration' to 'Decision made' back to 'Under consideration' mean for Nature? The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. Natures editors are unable to assign high priority to consideration of appeals. Even if the reviewers give positive recommendations, the editor can decide to reject a paper. We oversee this process to ensure that your manuscript contains everything our editors and peer reviewers need to perform a fair and thorough assessment of your work. Answered by Editage Insights More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. section 8 houses for rent in stockbridge, ga editor decision started nature rejection the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in All Rights Reserved. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. This decision will then be validated by the Editor-in-Chief. Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. Authors subsequently receive an e-proof, including the figures, and can also download a PDF proof of the layout. How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? //--> Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. Authors should use the formatting guide section to ensure that the level, length and format (particularly the layout of figures and tables and any Supplementary Information) conforms with Nature's requirements, at submission and each revision stage. I am at the same stage.