TIPS FOR NAVIGATING THIS PAGE This page categorizes court rules as outlined below. We remand to the District Court for consideration of the matter of costs and attorney fees on appeal. The interim justice then must run in the next general election after they have been appointed to stay on the Court. According to the HOA laws of Montana, associations may not prohibit homeowners from displaying political signs on their property or a common area in which the owner possesses an undivided interest. The member shall provide the homeowners' association with the date the real property was conveyed to the member and shall pay the recording fees for the document setting forth the exception. To conclude otherwise simply means that the contract between the property purchaser and the developer or seller as represented by the declaration of covenants is composed of essentially unenforceable promises and obligations. 26Did the court err in determining that the 1997 Amendment is valid and binding upon the Appellants' parcels even though the amendment did not contain any legal descriptions of the tracts of land owned by the Appellants? (2)A successor-in-interest to a member's real property may not claim the benefit of subsection (1) to the extent that the homeowners' association entered into, amended, or enforced a covenant, condition, or restriction before the successor-in-interest purchased the real property, even if the covenant, condition, or restriction was not enforceable against the previous owner pursuant to subsection (1), unless the successor-in-interest is owned by or shares ownership with the previous member or unless the successor-in-interest is a lender that acquired the real property through foreclosure. This process starts when the Montana Judicial Nominating Commission provides the Governor with a list of three to five nominees. About Supreme Court Find history, Justice biographies, cases, and more information about the Montana Supreme Court, the highest court of the Montana state court system. Rethink It. While some would argue that such rulings negate the purpose of having an HOA and neighborhood covenants, homeowners are not without recourse. Laws and Court Decisions. Most homeowners and condominium associations establish themselves as non-profit corporations. You're all set! 33I dissent from the Court's decision as to Issue 1, and would therefore not reach Issue 2 or 3. FTXs collapse and the push for centralized regulation of digital assets in the U.S. Are we about to see the rise of the right to earn a living? (5)Nothing in this section invalidates existing covenants of a homeowners' association or creates a private right of action for actions or omissions occurring before May 9, 2019. Notice for member meetings must be provided at least 10 days, but no more than 60 days, before the meeting takes place. Instead, most HOAs are set up as nonprofit organizations and are therefore subject to the. Decisions from an ALJ can only be enforced via contempt of court heard in Superior Court. It has a constitutional mandate to oversee the operations of lower courts in the state. 181, 517 N.W.2d 610, for their holdings that the power to amend restrictive covenants could not bind nonconsenting landowners to restrictions on use not contained in the original covenants. This page features various orders issued by the Montana Supreme Court involving such rules and oversight which are met, in part, through various Boards and Commissions. Boyles, 517 N.W.2d at 616. The HOA will then file the exemption with the county clerk so that it can be officially recorded. But efforts to alter how judges reach the bench aren't over. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. You can explore additional available newsletters here. at 265, 900 P.2d at 903. However, associations can impose reasonable regulations such as the size of the signs, the placement of the signs, and the time period during which owners can display the signs. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. If chicken coops were allowed when the property was purchased, the HOA, even with a 2/3-member vote, cannot enforce a restriction on chicken coops for homeowners that did not give their written consent. The amendment which was challenged in Caughlin, however, provided for assessments on new classifications of commercial or recreational property. 9On March 20, 1997, another Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants was recorded with the Missoula County Clerk and Recorder. HOA rules in Montana vary widely. Holders of over 65 percent of the acreage within lots 1 through 7 and 9 through 15 approved the changes, and thus validly modified the covenants. We affirm. Unless otherwise stated in the community Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R), each community member is allowed one vote. But, in doing so, these HOAs are going directly against Section 70-1-522 of the Montana Code. % HOA Finances: (b)When a member claims the benefit of this subsection (1), the member shall request that the homeowners' association record, or allow recording of, the exception applicable to the member. Illinois Supreme Court Find BIPA Claims Accrue Upon Each Scan and/or Disclosure, Possible, Not Probable: Massachusetts Business Litigation Session Applies Broad Standard for Evidence Preservation, Massachusetts Appeals Court Rejects Double Taxation Argument, Florida Supreme Court Finds Appraisers Cannot Have Pecuniary Interest in Outcome of Appraisal, Buyers Beware: Massachusettss Supreme Judicial Court Upholds Oral Exclusivity Contract In Favor of Buyers Real Estate Agent. that is to be turned into the Secretary of State. 35As noted, restrictive covenants are construed under the same rules as are other contracts. By: Marc Bardack HOAs can no longer force homeowners to comply with more rigorous restrictions than they agreed to when they purchased the property. In coming to this conclusion, the Court relied heavily on its past decisions. at 6, 917 P.2d at 929. 25The District Court's statement may have intuitive appeal, but it has little support in the stipulated facts or in the text of the 1997 Amendment. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. Unlike Montana, Michigan has a long appellate history regarding "residential use only" and defining its meaning. 70-17-901. The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that the district court properly concluded that (1) the relevant deeds and referenced subdivision plat created a roadway easement over Lots 70 and 71 to the benefit of other subdivision lots; (2) the disputed use of the roadway did not unreasonably interfere with use of the servient estates; and (3) Plaintiffs were not entitled to damages. Homeowners' association restrictions -- real property rights. I would reverse. Does the court's determination that the paving of Windemere Drive was done to address health and safety concerns of the residents represent reversible error? . 481, 484, 795 P.2d 436, 438. Fund (1994), 266 Mont. 30We conclude that, because the Appellants had actual notice of the 1997 Amendment, the question of whether they had inquiry or constructive notice as a result of the filing of the 1997 Amendment never arises. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. Justice JIM REGNIER delivered the Opinion of the Court. (1)(a) A homeowners' association may not enter into, amend, or enforce a covenant, condition, or restriction in such a way that imposes more onerous restrictions on the types of use of a member's real property than those restrictions that existed when the member acquired the member's interest in the real property, unless the member who owns the affected real property expressly agrees in writing at the time of the adoption or amendment of the covenant, condition, or restriction. HOAleader ?kCe=hvi1uF Y3U&#TLP}/-#:12Rm~|m7Z{ 95Tw:GB|y"''''RPTF;56 eIoqBn[kQF[g)C-[B}kSuPZ2ezclwO.#uB}drB}d. Jonathan FRAME, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. . The Bylaws of a Homeowners' Association (HOA) sets forth rules and procedures for how the HOA will function. In Sugarloaf Residential Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Greenwald, the homeowners sued the HOA for arbitrarily enforcing landscaping and other property improvement covenants against them and not against their neighbors. Between 1984 and 1991, several transfers of development rights and amendments to the covenants were recorded, the validity of which was not questioned and which are not relevant to our analysis in this case. Massachusetts Appeals Court Clarifies Scope of the Statute of Repose, The end of the Covid-19 public health emergency: impacts for hospitals, healthcare providers, and telehealth, To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate: That Is The Question, Supreme Court of Texas upholds order erroneously drafted by legal counsel as final judgment. If an account becomes delinquent, the HOA has the power to place liens on the property and, in extreme cases, can even foreclose on the property despite on-time mortgage payments. Will Georgia Counties be Governed by Popular Vote? at 484, 795 P.2d at 438. The premises, improvements and appurtenances shall be maintained in a safe, neat, clean and orderly condition. Does Your HOA Have a Kid-Related Rule Like This One? HOA Management (.com) Copyright 2023 | All rights reserved, Applicability submission by declaration required optional declaration for townhouses, Declaration to be approved by department of revenue before recording, Floor plans recorded with declaration certification, Bylaws adoption, recording, and amendment, Exclusive ownership and possession of unit joint ownership, Common elements undivided interest of unit owner, Common elements undivided interest to remain attached to unit, Common elements to remain undivided partition prohibited, Maintenance and improvement of common elements, Abandonment or waiver of use not to effect exemption, Compliance with bylaws, rules, and covenants required action, Restriction on covenants by association of unit owners, Liens to be satisfied or released at time of first conveyance, Lien allowable against unit not against the property, Construction lien no effect on nonconsenting owner exception, Lien effective against two or more units release from, Records of receipts and expenditures affecting common elements inspection, Claim for common expenses priority of lien contents recording, Foreclosure of lien under claim for common expenses action without foreclosure, Foreclosure on unit payment of rent purchase of unit by manager, Purchaser at foreclosure sale not totally liable for prior common expenses, Joint liability of grantor and grantee for unpaid common expenses, Insurance of building premiums as common expenses, Disclosure by seller seller to furnish documents delay period, Removal from chapter recorded instrument consent of lienholders, Obsolete property restoration or sale removal from chapter, Damage to property decision not to repair or rebuild removal from chapter, Effect of removal ownership in common liens, Effect of removal subject to partition sale, Consent by unit owner on behalf of lienholder, Nonapplicability building codes zoning regulations, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Formation, Articles of Incorporation Bylaws, Amendments Sections, Corporate Name, Registered Office and Agent, and Service of Process Sections, Directors and Officers Indemnification Sections, Merger, Consolidation, and Sale of Assets Sections, Annual Report Corporate Records Sections. A homeowner can claim the benefit of this bill by requesting their HOA to record the exception. In 2019, the state government passed State Bill No. Bruner, 272 Mont. The Montana Unit Ownership Act (Condominiums) regulates the creation, operation, authority, and management of condominium associations in the state. You can find the Montana Nonprofit Corporation Act under Title 35, Chapter 2 of the Montana Code. Select your category below, or browse all topics. 24The District Court noted a maintenance provision in the 1984 covenants which provided in relevant part: Each property owner shall provide exterior maintenance. Specifically, the, Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed the conclusion of the district court that the more than three-year delay between Defendant's arrest and his subsequent criminal trial did not violate his constitutional right to a speedy trial,. Therefore, they are bound by this Act. 51-12-33 impacting apportionment of fault against non-parties in single defendant cases, California court holds that board diversity law violates equal protection, Kentuckys Supreme Court examines the punitive damage multiplier in a case of first impression, Supreme Court clarifies favorable termination requirement for malicious prosecution claims, Red flag: Ninth Circuit affirms summary judgment against football-related wrongful death claims, Ohio Appellate Court reviews standard for claiming peer review privilege, Considerations for accountants in responding to a subpoena for client documents, Five things California lawyers have to report to the State Bar, D.C. The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the district court granting Defendants summary judgment and concluding that Elk Valley Road burdened Lots 70 and 71 to the benefit of other subdivision lot owners for ingress and agree to and from the adjoining off-plat land and concluding that Plaintiffs had no right to obstruct Elk Valley Road. (3)This section does not apply to a covenant, condition, or restriction: (a)that is not subject to enforcement by a homeowners' association; or. In two recent rulings, state trial court judges have rejected homeowner claims against homeowners associations (HOAs) for failing to enforce covenants against a neighbor. The amendatory language in the original covenants in this case is much more similar to that at issue in Sunday Canyon. I respectfully suggest that the trial court and, now, this Court have done exactly that in the case at bar. (b)that is required in order to comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. The Governor has 30 days to choose a nominee from this list, or otherwise the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will make the decision. 31Finally, the Association asks for its costs and attorney fees in resisting this unmeritorious appeal. Because the ultimate failure of Appellants' arguments is not sufficient to justify the imposition of costs and attorney fees under Rule 32, M.R.App.P., as damages for an appeal without merits we do not grant the Association's request. Overview of Midwest Sanitary, Inc. v. Sandberg, Phoenix, and Von Gontard, P.C. View details FHA Certification: The New Risk of HOA Discrimination Claims, Accommodation Requests Under the Fair Housing Act: Best Practices to Avoid Discrimination Claims & Lawsuits, The New Federal Housing Administration Rules and Your HOA, what is the grace period to replace board members, Certified mail for ANY notices to homeowners. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. For Legal Professionals. These rulings raise the question of whether HOA's can enforce neighborhood covenants selectively as they see fi (b)"Member" means a person that belongs to a homeowners' association and whose real property is subject to the jurisdiction of the homeowners' association. uPo The court reasoned that these provisions permit land owners to take affirmative steps to provide a safe, clean condition, and that the 74 percent super-majority vote for the 1997 Amendment reflected the majority's opinion that the health and welfare of subdivision occupants were being compromised by increased road dust caused by ever increasing traffic on the non-paved road. Appellants declare that this statement is not supported in the record. 70-17-901 Homeowners' association restrictions -- real property rights. 15The Appellants rely upon Lakeland Property Owners Association v. Larson (1984), 121 Ill.App.3d 805, 77 Ill.Dec. Judge David Dickinson reached a similar conclusion in the Forsyth County Superior Court case of Lake Astoria Community Association, Inc. v. Ingmire v. Furr where the homeowner sued the HOA for failing to enforce neighborhood covenants consistently. However, we note that the District Court awarded the Association costs and attorney fees below, pursuant to the restrictive covenants. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. You Cant Find Me Anymore: New Jersey Cracks Down on Employer Tracking, New York Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act Updates 2022, No more tears: Supreme Court rules damages for emotional distress are not recoverable under Title VI, Title IX, the Rehabilitation Act, or the Affordable Care Act, U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Parameters of Free Speech, Avoid These Practitioner Pitfalls When It Comes to Trade-Secret Misappropriation Trials, Employer overcomes religious-based challenge to vaccine mandate, Elon Musks planned purchase of Twitter reignites questions of open source code security, Res Ipsa Loquitur: The Massachusetts Appeals Court reverses Summary Judgment in favor of allowing a chair to speak for itself, Ohio Appellate Court addresses Permanent and Substantial Deformity, The Eleventh Circuit finds that a qualifying excess judgment for bad faith may be based on a consent judgment, rather than a verdict, Massachusetts High Court Issues Two Important Wage and Hour Decisions, PAGA Manageability Requirement: A Split of Authority in California, New Bridge Projects Raise New Opportunities and Risk Considerations, Georgia legislature passes amendment to O.C.G.A. While they are serving on the Supreme Court, they must continue to reside in Montana. The court further denied Plaintiffs' damages claims in trespass and for property damage resulting from the removal and destruction of the gate placed across the roadway by Plaintiffs to limit access to the adjoining land to themselves and their guests. We agree with that reasoning. In that respect, it is well_settled that [w]here the language of an agreement is clear and unambiguous and, as a result, susceptible to only one interpretation, the duty of the court is to apply the language as written. Carelli v. Hall (1996), 279 Mont. 19Appellants' observations are correct, to a point. Wilson v. Playa de Serrano 2 CA-CV 2005-0072. 1983, Law Firm Ordered to Produce Client Communications Despite the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work-Product Doctrine, Massachusetts high court holds that attorneys fees awarded under G.L. %K9\>g(,s\P_s]~B}RN8u 146, 69 P.3d 225; Watson, 33; Waters . The covenants, conditions, restrictions and uses created and established herein may be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed as to the whole of the said real property or any portion thereof with the written consent of the owners of sixty-five percent (65%) of the votes from the real property described herein above. According to this bill, HOAs may not compel homeowners to follow more onerous restrictions than the ones that already existed prior to their purchase of the real property. It consists of 11 parts, each one divided further into sections, listed below. It provides no protection whatsoever; it is worthless. Blogs. General - Sections 35-2-101 through 35-2-133 c. 93A are not covered under commercial liability insurance policy as damages because of bodily injury, Major Questions for Chevron Deference and Future Environmental Regulations: The Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA, Managing Construction Claims Risk In The Age Of Gen Z and The Great Resignation, The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Rules that Litigation Privilege Protects Attorney from Civil Liability in First Impression Case, Minnesota Just Made it Harder for Insureds to Claim Bad Faith, Pennsylvania Limits Risk Transfer for Snow and Ice Management Services, Massachusetts Appeals Court extends protections of the Statute of Repose, Supreme Court Clarifies Scope Of The Transportation Worker Exemption In The Federal Arbitration Act, Transition not substantial completion starts the clock: New Jersey amends statute of limitations for homeowner and condominium association construction defect cases, From property damage disputes to employment disputes, how the Supreme Courts decision in Morgan v. Sundance impacts the fate of arbitration clauses, Persistent Risks and Regulations: New Health Advisories For PFAS, California Tort Law: Brown v. Taekwondo U.S.A. and the no duty to aid rule, Be Careful What You Post: Personal Jurisdiction in Internet Defamation Lawsuits, Supreme Court of Georgia adopts standard for obtaining a protective order to prevent the deposition of high-ranking corporate executives, Executive orders issued during the Covid-19 pandemic did not create an impossibility or cause frustration sufficient to shield restaurant owner from its obligation to pay rent, Eleventh Circuit Finds for Insurer in COVID-19 Case of First Impression in Georgia, A month into recreational cannabis sales, NJ Employers still lack guidance on drugfree workplace enforcement, Down It Goes! IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 13N HARBOR VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Montana Corporation, Petitioner and Appellee, v. SAM WALDENBERG and SHIRLEEN WEESE, individually and as Trustees of the S&SW TRUST, Respondents and Appellants. 68, 459 N.E.2d 1164, 1169; Caughlin Ranch Homeowners Association v. Caughlin Club (1993), 109 Nev. 264, 849 P.2d 310; and Boyles v. Hausmann (1994), 246 Neb. xv|uO (B>j^ l9 oE>d#c;c"wnE>=n)v 7nE>kGg>8c6u.q:5{|qkFTr[6g-g;U`GwPY=L8 Illinois Prejudgment Interest Struck Down What To Do Now, Massachusetts High Court Strikes Down Capital Gains Tax Levied Against Non-Domiciled Corporation on Statutory Grounds, Right result. Police Training Reform Comes to Light in a California Courtroom. Montana Supreme Court Montana's Judicial Branch seeks to provide equal access to justice while building the public's trust and confidence in Montana courts. In this week's tip, we give you a heads up on a June U.S. Supreme Court decision you may not have noticed amidst all the news of the court's decisions on marriage equality and Obamacare. (815) 838-1000 Joliet, IL Real Estate Law, DUI & DWI, Family Law, Criminal Law, Estate Planning, Business Law Website Email Profile Mark T. Wakenight PREMIUM (708) 848-3159 Oak Park, IL Divorce, Family Law Website Email Profile John J. Lynch Chicago, IL (630) 283-7091 Bankruptcy, Probate, Foreclosure Defense, Real Estate Law, Estate Planning HOA LAWS AND REGULATIONS. For the first time in more than two decades, Pennsylvania enacts new facility regulations for long-term nursing care. Annual member meetings are mandatory to discuss and vote on any proposed association changes and elect board members. Circuit: The Second Most Important Court in America, Updating Your California Employee Handbooks in 2022, Significant Changes for Federal Contractors Likely Coming Soon, SCOTUS has granted certiorari in The Andy Warhol Foundation case, Congress Imposes New 72-Hour Reporting Requirement for Cyber Security Incidents, Chubb unit beats virus coverage suit brought by NJ apparel company, U.S. Womens Soccer Teams pay discrimination settlement is a good reminder for companies to assess their compensation systems, Florida Bad Faith: If Insurers Try Sometimes, They Just Might Find, They Get Summary Judgment, Commercial Litigation/Directors & Officers, Coronavirus - Insurance Coverage and Extra-Contractual Liability, Coronavirus Commercial Contracts and Risk Management, Coronavirus Construction & Design Professional, Coronavirus Financial Services And Banking, Financial Services and Banking Litigation, Insurance Coverage and Extra-Contractual Liability. 27Appellants point out that to be binding upon a parcel of real property, the recorded encumbrance must describe the land covered by it with sufficient accuracy to enable one examining the record to identify the land. Poncelet v. English (1990), 243 Mont. %PDF-1.4 21We conclude that Appellants' reliance upon Lakeland, Caughlin, and Boyles is misplaced. (iii)the ability to otherwise develop the real property in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations, unless the ability was impermissible according to the written or recorded restrictions. Tip of the Week. This, the Appellants argue, renders the 1997 Amendment invalid as to their properties. 333, 341, 922 P.2d 485, 489, that the district court could not broaden a covenant by adding that which was not contained therein. What HOA Boards Need to Know About Regulating Rentals. Obviously, that is not the law of contracts, nor is it the law of covenants-as our own jurisprudence clearly reflects (Texas case law notwithstanding). A court may be governed by several different sets of rules. As part of the purchase bargain they rightfully expect that such covenants will not be waived, abandoned, terminated, modified, altered or changed by other property owners except in strict compliance with the provisions of the declaration of covenants themselves or in accordance with supervening statutory law. 394, 398, 668 P.2d 243, 245. Sunday Canyon, 978 S.W.2d at 658. Additionally, homeowners always have the option of getting involved on their HOA boards in order to push the enforcement of covenants. However, the remaining language of the 1984 covenant printed above is broad. in the supreme court of the state of montana 2020 mt305 craig tracts homeowners'association,inc., tara j. chapman & matthew b. losey, donald c. and beverly a. friend, robert j. 1This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment entered by the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County. & andrea e. maricich family trust, mickelson investments, llc, sallie a.losey, hemingway patrick & carol t. revocable living trust, plaintiffs and appellants, v. brown . The Court must issue each of its decisions in writing, and any justice who dissents from the decision must issue a written dissenting opinion. [A]ll Defendants herein do not deny that in one way or another they had actual notice of the consideration and adoption of the 1997 Amendment by super-majority vote, and therefore, any claims by any of these Defendants that they should not be bound by the 1997 Amendment based upon claims of failure of adequate notice fails under the undisputed facts in this matter, whether or not these individual Defendants actually objected to or voted against the 1997 Amendment. If notice is sent out via mail, at least 30 days notice is required. 17In Boyles, the original covenants allowed for changes to [t]hese covenants, water use regulations, restrictions and conditions if a majority of the then owners agreed to change same in whole or in part. Boyles, 517 N.W.2d at 616. The association should then comply with the members request by recording the exception with the recorder of the county and the office of the county clerk where the real property is located. You can explore additional available newsletters here. They further maintain that the 1997 Amendment seeks to create new and substantially different covenants rather than to amend existing covenants. The Supreme Court also reviews appeals from the workers compensation and water courts. The mission of the State Law Library of Montana is to provide legal information and resources, to enhance knowledge of the law and court system, and to facilitate equal access to justice, statewide. The 1997 Amendment specifically authorizes the Association to reimburse the parties who paid for the paving of Windemere Drive and to assess subdivision landowners for the costs of such reimbursement. 68, 459 N.E.2d at 1169. In ruling against the homeowners, Gwinnett Superior Court Judge Michael Clark held that the HOA had the right to enforce covenants, but not an affirmative duty to do so. This Court continues to follow the Schmid rule. 14Appellants point out that restrictive covenants should not be extended by implication or enlarged by construction. We therefore hold that the District Court did not err in determining that the clause of the restrictive covenants allowing for amendment authorized the creation of new or unexpected restrictions not contained or contemplated in the original covenants. Listen 1:30. Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court reversed Defendant's sentence for driving under the influence (DUI), holding that the district court erred by sentencing Defendant to the Montana State Prison (MSP) and by requiring him to pay a $100, Justia Opinion Summary: The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant's conviction and sentence for two counts of felony tampering with witnesses, holding that Defendant was not entitled to relief on any of his allegations of error. By: Marc Bardack In two recent rulings, state trial court judges have rejected homeowner claims against homeowners associations (HOAs) for failing to enforce covenants against a neighbor. (d)"Real property" has the meaning provided in 70-1-106, except that it is limited to real property governed by a homeowners' association. Newman, 277 Mont. There is no intermediate appellate court in the state. 28The District Court determined that this argument by Appellants was not persuasive because the 1997 Amendment referred to the previously filed 1994 Amendment, which contains legal descriptions of all 14 original tracts. (c)"Person" means one or more individuals or a legal or commercial entity. Each justice on the Supreme Court serves an eight-year term. In other words, it does not have discretion to decide whether to review a case. The covenant language used in all three cases is markedly different from that used here. The 1997 Amendment created the Windemere Homeowners Association, Inc., and made the Association responsible for necessary maintenance, repair, reconstruction, and snow removal on Windemere Drive.