Michele E. Gilman, “Welfare, Privacy, and Feminism”

Abstract:
Feminism has long been concerned with privacy. Second-wave feminists assailed the divide between the public and the private spheres that trapped women in the home, excluded them from the workforce, and subjected them to domestic abuse. Second-wave feminists also argued in favor of a sphere of privacy that would allow women to make reproductive choices without state interference. These were powerful critiques of existing power structures, but they tended to overlook the experiences of poor women. As a condition of receiving welfare benefits, poor women have been subjected to drug tests, and they continue to face unannounced home inspections by government officials, fingerprinting, and restrictions on their reproductive choices. These formal welfare requirements overlay routinized surveillance of poor women, who must comply with extreme verification requirements to establish eligibility, travel to scattered offices to procure needed approvals, reappear in person at welfare offices at regular intervals to prove their ongoing eligibility, and answer intrusive questions about their child rearing and intimate relationships. Thus, while many Americans are uneasy about their privacy in a time of technological transformation, the harms poor women face from privacy deprivations go far beyond unease. This essay describes the privacy invasions experienced by welfare mothers and how the law has shaped their rights to privacy. It then explores how second-wave feminism considered privacy as experienced by poor women, and it analyzes whether third-wave feminism is up to the task of better securing privacy rights for poor women. The conclusion suggests a feminist advocacy strategy that would include the voices of poor women within a new conception of privacy.

Downloadable here.

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off on Michele E. Gilman, “Welfare, Privacy, and Feminism”

Follow Feminist Law Professors on Twitter

You can subscribe to our Twitter feed  here.

We Feminist Law Profs can tweet ourselves. We don’t need someone else to do it for us.  (See today’s NY Times on “ghost twitterers” here.)

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on Follow Feminist Law Professors on Twitter

Burger Pornography Starring a Former Vegetarian

In a new commercial for Hardee’s “Western Bacon Thickburger,” Padma Lakshmi, former vegetarian and current host of reality TV show Top Chef, strolls through a farmer’s market and takes up residence on an urban stoop.  She takes a burger out of a fast food bag and opens her mouth wide.  Lakshmi  pulls up her dress and seems to be enjoying herself thoroughly.  She licks sauce from her fingers and legs.  A bit of sauce (“that sweet, spicy sauce”) splatters her cheek.  Tag line of the commercial? “More than just a piece of meat.”  I’m pretty sure that refers to the burger, not Lakshmi, but it’s difficult to say.

The ad is, to put it mildly, an extreme example of “sex sells.”  To what extent does the ad reflect the influence of pornography?  But for the widespread availability of pornography, would we have a commercial like this one?  Is it not just sex that “sells,” but a certain kind of sex that sells?  What’s the difference between sexy advertising and what seems to be pornography-influenced advertising?  Is there any difference between, say, the  Hardee’s commercial and, say, the  Enjoli  frangrance commercial from the 1970s (“I can bring home the bacon.  Fry it up in a pan.  And never let you forget you’re a man.  ‘Cause I’m a woman. Enjoli.“)?

I think they have more than just a bit of bacon in common.

-Bridget Crawford


Share
Posted in Baconpheffer, Feminism and Animal Law, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on Burger Pornography Starring a Former Vegetarian

Breast is Best?

Hannah Rosin expresses her doubts here in The Atlantic.   Here’s the intro:

In certain overachieving circles, breast-feeding is no longer a choice:it’s a no-exceptions requirement, the ultimate badge of responsible parenting. Yet the actual health benefits of breast-feeding are surprisingly thin, far thinner than most popular literature indicates. Is breast-feeding right for every family? Or is it this generation’s vacuum cleaner:an instrument of misery that mostly just keeps women down?

For some women, breast-feeding comes easily.   For others, it is more of a struggle.   For some it is an impossibility (for medical reasons or otherwise).   Information about the benefits of breast-feeding is good.   But women shouldn’t torture themselves if they can’t/don’t want to/don’t want to breast-feed for long.   Choice is good.   Pressure is not.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Women's Health | Comments Off on Breast is Best?

These Pictures Tell Thousands of Words

 

p2009032713293339912319822
xin_26203062711153431789213Hanne Dahl, Denmark’s representative to the European Parliament, brought her child to work yesterday (photos by Vincent Kessler, Reuters). Dahl’s EU Parliament page is here.  According to the website maintained by the Alliance for a Europe of Democracies (here):  

Hanne Dahl was born in 1970 in Aalborg, Denmark. She grew up partially in Malaysia, Indonesia and Singapore where she attended different international schools. She now lives in Aars in the north of Jutland with her husband and two children. She has worked as a priest for several years and also as a Political Consultant in the European Parliament before she took up her current position as an MEP for the Danish JuneMovement in May 2008 succeeding Jens-Peter Bonde. She is the top candidate for the JuneMovement in the June 2009 election and has been recently elected Co-Chairwoman for the IND/DEM Group in the European Parliament.

On seeing these photos, my first (U.S.-centric) thought was, “And it wasn’t even ‘Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day.'”

No word on what the men sitting on either side of Dahl thought of their newest seat companion.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Sisters In Other Nations | 2 Comments

Camera Extension

null

Via.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Camera Extension

Bad News on Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships

Bad news on two fronts in the battle for legal recognition of same-sex relationships today. First, a bill that would allow same-sex couples in Hawaii to enter into civil unions died in that state’s senate. Second, the governor of Vermont has indicated that he will veto the same-sex marriage bill that has been making its way through that state’s legislature. The bill could still become law despite a veto; however, it would apparently require a 2/3 vote in each chamber of the Vermont legislature.

-Tony Infanti

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Bad News on Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships

Lambda Legal Internship Opportunity

Intern in Education & Public Affairs at Lambda Legal

120 Wall Street, National Headquarters, New York

Lambda Legal’s Education and Public Affairs Department seeks college and high school students for Summer 2009 semester internships in our New York City national headquarters. This is an opportunity for students to gain hands-on outreach and/or communications experience at a national nonprofit organization specializing in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and HIV civil rights law.

Qualifications: A familiarity with issues that are important to LGBTQ and people with HIV is not necessary but will strengthen an application. Interns must be detail-oriented, well-organized, comfortable working independently and as part of a team.

Duties may include some of the following:

  • Research media outlets and organizations and contacts for input into database
  • Upkeep of media clipping files
  • Assembling media packets
  • Participating in public education and community outreach events
  • Coordinate participation in summer pride events
  • Helping to distribute publications
  • Transcribing taped interviews
  • Proofreading and light copy editing
  • Data entry
  • Some writing for Lambda Legal’s print and online publications
  • Light HTML
  • Copying and filing; and other administrative tasks

Lambda Legal provides a pleasant, collegial environment for students interested in law, LGBT issues, civil rights, organizing and/or nonprofit workplaces. Interns must be able to work 16 to 24 hours a week between 9:30 and 5:30, Monday through Friday at Lambda Legal’s office, located at 120 Wall Street.

Funding: As this is a nonpaying position, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek out and apply for grants from their school or other sources.

Application Procedure: Applicants should send a resume, cover letter and 1-2 page writing sample to Shayna Pinckney at spinckney@lambdalegal.org by April 15, but you are encouraged to apply early to ensure full and timely consideration. You may also apply after this time, but we will only process post-deadline applications as needed. The cover letter should include the applicants’ hours of availability for the semester and the phone numbers and titles of two references. More information can be found at http://www.lambdalegal.org.

Gain experience this summer!

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Lambda Legal Internship Opportunity

Nine Children, Nine Mothers, One Father: Why Isn’t He the Novem-Dad?

The  media dubbed Nadya Suleman the “octo-mom,” but noone calls Travis Henry  the “novem-dad.”  

The former NFL running back has fathered nine children with nine different women in six years (see NY Times story here). He is engaged to a tenth woman.  Henry has gone to jail for failing to pay child support (this year) and after being arrested on cocaine trafficking charges (last year).  Yet Henry has received far less attention than Suleman.  When a man has an “excessive” number of children, he is considered foolish or potent or maybe a victim of an opportunistic (read: gold-digging) woman.  But a woman who has an “excessive” number of children?    She must be crazy.

In our Multiple Anxieties piece, Lolita Buckner Inniss and I are critical of the epithet “octo-mom.” It likens Suleman to an animal or reduces her to a metonymic body part.  In their excellent article Eight is Enough, Naomi Cahn and Jennifer Collins  describe some of the cultural backlash against  Suleman as arising out of her singleness and her unemployed status, among other factors.  But where’s the backlash against Travis Henry?  He may have been a well-paid professional athlete, but now Henry’s lawyer claims  (here)  that his client is “virtually broke.”  He fathered his first child while still in high school.  Eight of the nine children were unplanned, according to Henry, who also claims in the NY Times article that “[e]verything was cool” with the mothers of his then-existing children,” but once he signed with a professional football team, “[t]hen they were out for blood.”

A man who conceives a child unintentionally receives far less scrutiny than a woman who conceives intentionally.  (BTW, Henry says that he was surprised every time one of his partners became pregnant.)  

A story of an African-American man with nine children whom he claims he cannot support  does not receive much attention because it plays into deeply entrenched racial stereotypes about black men and black families.  But a single woman — who turns out to be “kinda” white (read: not black, not Latina, so she must be “white” in America) — who has fourteen children?  Her story receives attention, at least in part, because we have no racial narrative to explain her reproductive choices.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Race and Racism, Sexism in the Media | 9 Comments

United Airlines settles harassment suit over cockpit pornography

The Seattle Times reports:

United Airlines has settled a federal sexual-harassment lawsuit filed by a former pilot who grounded herself after repeatedly finding pornography hidden in the cockpits of domestic airline flights.

Details of the settlement with former Capt. Lisa Stout are secret. The 2-year-old lawsuit was resolved earlier this month, just weeks before it was set to go to trial before U.S. District Judge John Coughenour in Seattle.

Before the settlement, Coughenour had ruled that United’s efforts to dismiss the case were “unpersuasive,” and determined that Stout would be allowed to seek punitive damages against the airline if the suit went to trial.

Stout’s attorney, Victoria Vreeland, said a nondisclosure agreement executed with the settlement prevented her from talking about it. United’s attorneys did not return telephone messages. An airline spokeswoman in Chicago, Megan McCarthy, said the airline would not comment.

Court documents show that Stout, a United 737 captain based out of Seattle, found pornographic photos of women on more than 20 flights in 2004 and 2005. Her lawsuit alleged that United’s efforts to catch the perpetrators were inadequate and the company retaliated against her after she reported it. …

The article also notes:

After Stout complained, her supervisor and a human-resources official for United decided they would not be able to determine who was placing the offensive material on the flight decks because so many people had access: flight crews, maintenance crews, mechanics and others. Instead, they sent an e-mail to flight crews warning them that “inappropriate materials” had been found in cockpits and telling them to note any further instances in the logbook and notify the flight office.

That’s really confidence inspiring in a post 9/11 world, isn’t it? Read the entire article here. Via.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and the Workplace | Comments Off on United Airlines settles harassment suit over cockpit pornography

Financial Scandals Hit the Surrogacy Market

Slate has more details here about funds missing from trust accounts that a California surrogacy agency recommended its clients establish to facilitate payments to surrogates. The Slate article, entitled “Fetal Foreclosure,” asks in its subtitle, “If You Stop Paying a Surrogate Mother, What Happens to the Fetus?”

Here’s one of the sentences in the article that got my attention:

Thousands of women have hired themselves out as gestational surrogates. If you’re the child’s genetic mother, you can put a clause in the contract stipulating  under what circumstances the surrogate can abort  the pregnancy. But  no court will enforce that clause, because you aren’t the one who’s pregnant. The surrogate is. She can choose abortion unilaterally. All you can do is  stop paying her  for carrying the child.

I have deep, deep ambivalence about viewing surrogacy arrangements as “just” contracts.  I believe that a woman is capable of making a fully-informed decision to carry a child for another person, and so surrogacy contracts should be respected by law.  On the other hand, I think a surrogacy contract is very different from almost any other contract I can imagine.  

The Slate article invites us to imagine a scenario in which a genetic mother (presumably) wants to prevent the gestational surrogate from aborting a fetus.  What about a scenario in which a genetic mother (or father) wants to gestational surrogate to abort, but the gestational surrogate refuses?  The vocabulary of contracts (bargain, benefit, specific performance, damages) collides in my mind with the vocabulary of constitutional freedoms (right of privacy, right to control one’s own body).  

The vocabulary of contracts also fails when I try to think through what does happen to the fetus if the surrogate is not paid?  I would hope that the surrogate would continue to carry the pregnancy to term.  But does that devalue the surrogate’s work?  Why should I hope (or even expect) a surrogate to work for free, when I don’t expect other workers to do the same?  Because there is a child involved?  Because I think pregnancy is work, but a different kind of work that is not as “important” as traditional market labor?  Because the desire to have a child is so strongly felt?  

At some level, the hope that an unpaid surrogate would continue to carry the pregnancy to term is grounded in a belief — which I suspect is a myth — that surrogates are altruists.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Reproductive Rights, Women and Economics | 2 Comments

Jonathan Todres, “Law, Otherness, and Human Trafficking”

Abstract:
Despite concerted efforts to combat human trafficking, the trade in persons persists and, in fact, continues to grow. This article suggests that a central reason for the limited success in preventing human trafficking is the dominant conception of the problem, which forms the basis for law developed to combat human trafficking. Specifically, the author argues that “otherness” is a root cause of both inaction and the selective nature of responses to the abusive practice of human trafficking. Othering operates across multiple dimensions, including race, gender, ethnicity, class, caste, culture, and geography, to reinforce a conception of a virtuous “Self” and a devalued “Other.” This article exposes how this Self/Other dichotomy shapes the phenomenon of human trafficking, driving demand for trafficked persons, influencing perceptions of the problem, and constraining legal initiatives to end the abuse. By examining human trafficking through an otherness-aware framework, this article aims to elucidate a deeper understanding of human trafficking and offer a prescription for reducing the adverse effects of otherness on both efforts to combat human trafficking and the individuals that now suffer such abuses.

Downloadable here!

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, The Overrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on Jonathan Todres, “Law, Otherness, and Human Trafficking”

Octomom: Social Factoring the Numbers (Or, LCD meets OCD)

In recent weeks the airwaves have sizzled with stories about Nadya Suleman, the California woman who gave birth to octuplets conceived via assisted reproductive technology. In doing so, Suleman breached numerous mainstream social norms of motherhood.

First and foremost, in having eight babies, she went way beyond the two-child home that has become the standard for middle class-dom. There seems to be a Familial Least Common Denominator rule applicable to middle class parenting. You take the mother, put her in the numerator and put the number of kids in the denominator and you win points based on how close the resulting fraction is to one. If you’re wealthy and socially well-placed, extra kids can be subtracted out in direct proportion to how much money and social cachet you have. You lose automatically if the numerator is greater than one–Heather cannot have multiple mommies!

Fuzzy math for sure, but Suleman got the math way wrong. The eight babies were, moreover, in addition to six that she already had at home. It is true that the media and the public have a longstanding fascination with multiple births and with large families (who can forget movies like”Cheaper by the Dozen”which seems to keep being re-made, TV shows like the”Brady Bunch,”or even those current reality shows about multiple sibs?) But there’s a point at which”yay”becomes”yuck”, and that happens right around the time that parents of the brood are revealed to be Other:outside of racial and class norms.

Early reports made Nadya Suleman out to be non-white. With all those kids, (and those lips!) she must be black, right? Just another welfare queen. I was at a birthday party out in Brooklyn back when the news broke and the disapproving whispers of the mostly West Indian party-goers seemed to confirm it –“she’s black, you know; making us look bad!”It was soon revealed that at some point she had been married to a man named Gutierrez. Aha, a Latina. They have lots of babies, too, right? But, no, wait, there’s more! She’s really, per her own account, half Arabic and half-Lithuanian. Oh (silence). One of those people from the nether-regions of the world. Not black. Not Latina. But only sort of white.

Besides breaching racial norms, Suleman breached class norms. According to media accounts, Suleman’s chief means of support for the years leading up to the birth of the octuplets seemed to be disability payments and food stamps for some of the children. How, people wondered, could she afford assisted reproductive technology? That’s for the wealthy, right? Scandal!

The media could posit few acceptable reasons for breaching norms in so spectacular a fashion, bearing and keeping so many babies. So… Nadya Suleman must be crazy. Men-tally ill. Some commentators suggested that Suleman might be suffering from obsessive-compulsive disorder.”Hooked on pregnancy,”as one writer suggested. Addiction to addition.

You can read more about the socio-legal anxieties engendered by Nadya Suleman and her babies in an abstract of a paper written by Professor Bridget Crawford (of Feminist Law Professors fame) and me at Multiple Anxieties.

-Lolita Buckner Inniss

(cross-post from Ain’t I a Feminist Legal Scholar, Too?)

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Race and Racism, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Octomom: Social Factoring the Numbers (Or, LCD meets OCD)

Naomi Cahn and Jennifer M. Collins, “Eight is Enough”

The Abstract
On January 26, 2009, the nation’s second set of live-born octuplets was delivered. The public fascination with this event quickly turned ugly when the media revealed that the mother was thirty-three year-old Nadya Suleman, who is single, unemployed, and already caring for six children under the age of eight.

The cultural backlash against Suleman has focused on three separate issues. The first revolves around Suleman herself, and her ability as a single, unemployed mother to parent fourteen young children successfully. A second set of concerns revolves around the medical procedures at her fertility clinic. How could the clinic agree to implant a woman under the age of thirty-five with at least six embryos? A final set of issues concerns more fundamental questions about screening parents. How could a clinic provide a single woman with six children with treatment that could double the number of children she has? As a result, commentators and legislators are calling for new, more restrictive regulation of the fertility industry.

We support some of these initiatives, specifically more meaningful limits on the number of embryos that may be transferred in any single IVF procedure. But we are far more troubled by another set of proposals: some commentators are now urging the imposition of restrictions on which individuals may receive fertility treatment. Under this theory, women with a certain number of children, or with limited financial resources, should be precluded from receiving further treatment. Our conclusion here differs from our position about regulating the medical procedures themselves: as we explain, neither fertility clinics nor the state should be in the business of restricting access to reproductive technology.

Downloadable here!

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Naomi Cahn and Jennifer M. Collins, “Eight is Enough”

“Sarah Palin – Objectification – Reaction – Situation”

That is the title of an interesting post at The Situationist which provides an overview of research by psychologists from University of South Florida, Jamie L. Goldenberg and Nathan A. Heflick,  which examined the objectifying effects of thinking about Sarah Palin’s appearance. Here is a short excerpt:

Goldenberg said that, after factoring out Democratic respondents (who solidly supported Obama), the Republicans and independents asked to write about Palin’s appearance said they were less likely to vote GOP than those who simply considered Palin as a person.

“There was an overall tendency to perceive Sarah Palin as less competent than Angelina Jolie,”said Goldenberg, noting their results fell in line with previous studies indicating that, in high status and political jobs, attractive women were perceived as less competent in ways attractive men and women in other jobs were not.

. . . .Goldenberg said the study, which is to be published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, may spark more questions than it answers.

“What you can’t tell from this is what did they finally do in the end?”said Joel Cooper, a professor of psychology at Princeton University and editor of the journal publishing Goldenberg and Heflick’s study.”But at the moment they thought of (Palin) as a beauty queen, they were less likely to consider voting for (her) … Knowing that is important for campaigns and how we understand each other.”

Another question: Are female politicians who play down their appearance, like Hillary Clinton, instinctively on to something?

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics | Comments Off on “Sarah Palin – Objectification – Reaction – Situation”

Client’s use of eff word gets lawyer sanctioned.

From here:

A federal judge has levied sanctions of more than $29,000 on a lawyer and his client after finding that a deposition was a “spectacular failure” because of the client’s constant use of vulgar language and insults and dodging or refusing to answer questions, and his lawyer’s failure to rein him in.

In his 44-page opinion in GMAC Bank v. HTFC Corp., U.S. District Judge Eduardo C. Robreno found that Aaron Wider, the CEO of HTFC, engaged in “hostile, uncivil, and vulgar conduct, which persisted throughout the nearly 12 hours of deposition testimony.”

Robreno noted that Wider used the “F word” or variations of it 73 times during the deposition and that the video shows that his lawyer, Joseph R. Ziccardi of Chicago, at one point “snickered” at his client’s conduct.

Ziccardi was also to blame, Robreno found, because he failed to stop his client’s tirades and persuade him to answer questions.

“The nature of Wider’s misconduct was so severe and pervasive, and his violations of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure so frequent and blatant, that any reasonable attorney representing Wider would have intervened in an effort to curb Wider’s misconduct,” Robreno wrote.

“Ziccardi’s failure to address, then and there, Wider’s misconduct could have no other effect but to empower Wider to persist in his behavior. Under these circumstances, the court equates Ziccardi’s silence with endorsement and ratification of Wider’s misconduct,” Robreno wrote.

As a result, Robreno concluded that both Wider and Ziccardi should be sanctioned under Rule 30 and Rule 37, and that Wider must appear for a new deposition which will be taken under the supervision of a federal magistrate judge.

As Christopher Fairman has noted, that word has a lot of power. But wouldn’t it have been just as bad from a practical standpoint if the client refused to answer questions and engaged in cuss-word-free tirades?

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Legal Profession, Sociolinguistics | Comments Off on Client’s use of eff word gets lawyer sanctioned.

Note that it happened in NORTH Carolina…

This. Oy.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Academia, Race and Racism, South Carolina | 1 Comment

Sixth Annual IP/Gender: Mapping the Connections Conference – “Female Fan Culture and Intellectual Property” April 23 & 24, 2009

Presented by American University Washington College of Law’s Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, Women and the Law Program, and Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, in collaboration with American University’s Center for Social Media and The Organization for Transformative Works.

Featuring projects and multimedia works reflecting on gender, copyright, fair use, freedom of expression and fan culture.

Thursday, April 23, 2009 | 7:15 pm
Multimedia Show:”WeTube: Women Transforming Mass Media”
Francesca Coppa, Muhlenberg College | Jonathan McIntosh, Digital Artist and Media Activist

Friday, April 24, 2009 | 9:00 am : 4:30 pm
Opening Remarks by Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown University Law Center

Is There a Text in This Work?

Transformation Beyond the Written Word New Forms of Organizing: Women Reinterpret the Legal, the Educational and the Political

Cui Bono? Economic Contexts

Ann Bartow, University of South Carolina | Francesca Coppa, Muhlenberg College | Casey Fiesler, Vanderbilt University | Melissa Tatum, University of Arizona | Robert Spoo, University of Tulsa | Tisha Turk, University of Minnesota | Ann Shalleck, Washington College of Law | Laura Murray, Queen’s University | Jordan Gilbertson,   University of La Verne, College of Law| Karen Hellekson, Transformative Works and Cultures | Peter Jaszi, Washington College of Law | Kristina Busse, University of South Alabama | Abigail De Kosnik, University of California, Berkeley | Zahr Said Stauffer, University of Virginia School of Law

For online registration, link to webcast and updates, please visit:
http://www.wcl.american.edu/pijip/go/events/ip/gender

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Law, Feminism and the Arts, Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Sixth Annual IP/Gender: Mapping the Connections Conference – “Female Fan Culture and Intellectual Property” April 23 & 24, 2009

Portia De Rossi Apologizes For Getting Married

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, It's satire, in case that requires pointing out, LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Portia De Rossi Apologizes For Getting Married

Justice O’Connor on Women’s Rights

Justice O’Connor participated in an interview with the New York Times to promote her new website for children.   Though she declines to call herself a feminist, take note of what she does say:

Do you call yourself a feminist?

I never did. I care very much about women and their progress. I didn’t go march in the streets, but when I was in the Arizona Legislature, one of the things that I did was to examine every single statute in the state of Arizona to pick out the ones that discriminated against women and get them changed.

So do you call yourself a feminist today?

I don’t call myself that.

Is there a label you prefer?

A fair judge and a hard worker.

(She also had some very nice things to say about Justice Ginsberg.)     While  Justice O’Connor may not be thought of as a “feminist” and rejects that label, a parsing of her opinions in Ngyuen v. INS and the main portion of Planned Parenthood v. Casey – which essentially saved Roe – say enough about her judicial philosophy in this regard.

— Nareissa L. Smith, cross-posted from Constitutional Law Prof Blog

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Firsts, Sociolinguistics, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on Justice O’Connor on Women’s Rights

Yale Law School Has A Woman “Acting Dean”

Current Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh has been nominated by President Obama to serve as the Legal Adviser of the U.S. Department of State. Taking his place as Acting Dean is Prof. Kate Stith. More here.

null

Share
Posted in Academia, Firsts, Law Schools, Law Teaching | Comments Off on Yale Law School Has A Woman “Acting Dean”

From the Department of: “Women Law Profs Don’t Know Anything About Hate Speech”

Columbia Law School division. This lecture series is advertising this speaker line up:

‘Hate Speech’ and Incitement to Violence

This workshop series is being convened by Professor Kendall Thomas and Lecturer-in-Law Peter Molnar, Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Media and Communication Studies at the Central European University.

Monday, February 9, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Professor C. Edwin Baker of the University of Pennsylvania Law School
“Hate Speech”

Monday, February 16, 2009
WJW 600, 12:15 – 1:40pm
Professor Monroe Price, Director of the Center for Global Communication Studies at the Annenberg School, University of Pennsylvania
“Orbiting Hate? Satellite Transponders and Free Expression”

Monday, February 23, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Peter Molnar, Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Media and Communication Studies, Central European University
“Towards Improved Law and Policy on ‘Hate Speech’ – The ‘Clear and Present Danger’ Test in Hungary”

Monday, March 23, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Professor Robert Post of Yale Law School
“Hate Speech”

Monday, April 13, 2009
WJW 600, 12:15 – 1:40pm
Professor Arthur Jacobson of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Thursday, April 16, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Professor Frederick Schauer of   the University of Virginia

Monday, April 20, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Professor Michel Rosenfeld of the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

Monday, April 27, 2009
WJW 600, 4:15 – 5:45pm
Professor Irwin Cotler, Member of the Canadian Parliament, Former Minister of Justice & Attorney General of Canada, Professor of Law (on leave) McGill University

***********
Via a blogroll member who notes this particularly appalling given the fact that most of the victims of ‘incitement to violence’ are FEMALE.

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, Law Schools, Law Teaching, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on From the Department of: “Women Law Profs Don’t Know Anything About Hate Speech”

Hoarding Babies, Hoarding Animals

I previously blogged (here) about my essay, co-authored with  Lolita Buckner Inniss,  Multiple Anxieties: Breaching Race, Class and Gender Norms With Assisted Reproduction.  Multiple Anxieties is about is about misplaced attention on women’s bodies.   Focusing on Nadya Suleman, the California woman who gave birth to octuplets in January, we explore socio-legal anxieties about gender, race, class and geography.   To theorize about the increasing availability of reproductive technology is to uncover a deep ambivalence about”choice”as it applies to women and their bodies.

The public reacted strongly and negatively to the Suleman’s story.   How could anyone have octuplets?   And how could anyone have octuplets when they already have six other children?  “She must be crazy,”the internet commentators suggested.

There is a way in which Suleman is being read as kind of”collector”or”hoarder”of children, the way some people hoard animals.  Animal hoarding is characterized (here) by  The Hoarding of Animals Research Consortium  by the presence of these criteria:

  • More than the typical number of companion animals
  • Inability to provide even minimal standards of nutrition, sanitation, shelter, and veterinary care, with this neglect often resulting in starvation, illness, and death
  • Denial of the inability to provide this minimum care and the impact of that failure on the animals, the household, and human occupants of the dwelling

As I read the negative criticism of Suleman, the outcry comes not only from the fact she has”more than the typical number”of children, but also that she seems to lack an independent (i.e., non-government) source of financial support for the children’s”nutrition, sanitation, shelter”and medical care.   In interviews, Suleman presents as a calm and”beatific”presence,  as if she is in some kind of denial  about her ability to care for the children.

In our essay (full version  here) Professor Inniss and I attempt to unpack the”multiple anxieties”that Suleman’s story has exposed.   Some of those anxieties are about race and class.   If a wealthy person has”more than the typical number”of children (or companion animals, for that matter) how likely are they to be read as a (crazy) hoarder?   Not very likely, is my guess.   With both children and companion animals, the wealthy can outsource the work to paid caretakers.   The wealthy are more likely to live in larger residences.   This in turn reducing the immediate negative impact of the presence of many children (or animals) on other occupants of the dwelling.   Plus the wealthy have permission to be”eccentric.”Middle-class and poor people who exhibit the same behaviors are”crazy.”

I do not wish to suggest that having 14 children or companion animals is normatively good or even wise.   But I do think we should be explicit about the biases that we bring to a determination of some idealized,”typical”(read: acceptable) number of children or animals.

-Bridget Crawford

(cross-post from Animal Blawg)

Share
Posted in Feminism and Animal Law, Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Families | 1 Comment

Eat Me.

Via I Blame the Patriarchy, I found the blog Suicide Food, which tracks “depiction[s] of animals that act as though they wish to be consumed.” Images like this:

null

and this:

null

That second one makes me think about terminating the “baconpheffer” category here. It was always meant ironically, since I am a vegetarian, but at the moment I’m not remembering why I thought featuring baconphernelia here was funny.

Twisty writes:

Primo stuff! Smiling cartoon pigs throw themselves onto flames, anxious to become palate-pleasing morsels; beer-guzzling crawfish contentedly paddle a soup-pot down a river of broth with celery oars; libertine barnyard animals yuk it up pre-mortem in a full-blown debauch. And yes, blogger Ben addresses one of the most repellent TV commercials ever aired, the one where a couple of talking pigs, seated at a restaurant, tuck into an enormous plate of ham and toss off one-liners about enjoying the”flavors of a fallen friend.”

The parallels between the myth of the happy hooker and the myth of the self-sacrificing meat animal are legion. Both prostituted women and livestock are the creations of a culture of domination. Both are controlled by organized systems of oppression. Both are ostentatiously and gluttonously consumed by a privileged class. Once consumed, both are left to rot with last night’s garbage. Both represent the privileged class’s celebration of itself and its contempt for anything it happens to debase in the course of its daily pillages. And the myths about oppressed individuals choosing to serve the vulgar interests of their oppressors have been created to allow the dominant culture’s beneficiaries to sleep at night.

And, see also.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Baconpheffer, Feminism and Culture | 2 Comments

“Jaded”

That’s the name of this post at What Tami Said, a blog I like a lot. Tami is a talented writer and her posts are always interesting. Here’s a short except from “Jaded“:

Women’s equality, I think, is best achieved–not through a feminist movement, but through feminist movements comprised of coalitions of women working toward their unique goals. Maybe that’s the way it has always been. Come to think of it, I’m sure this is the way it has always been. All different kinds of women doing their thing in their communities. It is the larger society, with its skewed notions of who is most important,  and (sometimes) recognized feminist leaders, who have absorbed those skewed notions, that have assigned a “face” to feminism that is not mine and may not be yours. But, in truth,  feminism is not one face, but  faces. We should all remember that.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, Feminist Blogs Of Interest, Feminist Legal History, Race and Racism | Comments Off on “Jaded”

“I Was Followed, Harassed, And Ambushed By Bill O’Reilly’s Producer”

Read Amanda Terkel’s story here.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media, Sociolinguistics | Comments Off on “I Was Followed, Harassed, And Ambushed By Bill O’Reilly’s Producer”

Murray on “Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life”

Feminist Law Prof Melissa Murray (Berkeley) has posted to SSRN her article, “Strange Bedfellows: Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life” (forthcoming, Iowa L. Rev.).  Here is the abstract:  

This Article focuses on the relationship between criminal law and family law in the regulation of marriage, sex, and intimate life. In doing so, it accomplishes two things. First, it challenges an ingrained narrative that argues that until quite recently, the home and family were impervious to criminal intervention. This Article reveals that, in fact, criminal law, working in tandem with family law, has long played an important role in the legal construction of intimate life. Additionally, the Article argues that we have overlooked criminal law and family law’s cooperative role in organizing intimate life to our detriment. Historically, criminal law and family law have worked in tandem to produce a binary view of intimate life that categorizes intimate acts and choices as either legitimate marital behavior or illegitimate criminal behavior. More recently, however, cases like Eisenstadt v. Baird and Lawrence v. Texas appear to reorganize sex in a more continuous fashion. In these cases, I argue, the traditional marriage-crime binary is disrupted in favor of a continuum where marriage and crime remain fixed as outer extremes framing an interstitial space where intimate acts and choices are neither valorized as marital behavior nor vilified as criminal behavior.  

This zone where sex exists outside of marriage and crime is one of incredible potential and promise. However, as this Article makes clear, this potential has been largely unrealized. Because we have been inattentive to the relationship between criminal law and family law, it has operated under our radar and the binary that it produces has become the ingrained and reflexive way for us to understand, organize, and regulate sex. When faced with the prospect of disrupting this binary in favor of a zone where sex is not regulated by criminal law or family law, we reflexively revert back to what we have known and attempt to interpret this new space through our binary lens. As such, we have bypassed an important opportunity to theorize and work towards a new understanding of sex outside of law.

Melissa’s work should have broad appeal to many of us whose work falls into the messy cracks in the binaries public vs. private, family vs. market, etc.  I’m half-way through reading the article and recommend it!

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminist Legal Scholarship | Comments Off on Murray on “Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life”

“Frontiers in Social Justice Lawyering: Critical Race Revisited,” April 16-17, 2009

This free program will be held at Yale, April 16-17, 2009:

In 1997, Yale Law School held a conference on Critical Race Theory (CRT) with some of the founding members of that discipline. Twelve years later, this conference on Critical Race Theory intends to look at the developments in CRT as an academic discipline and its ability to respond to new voices, contemporary issues, and emergent social movements. The conference in 2009 is an opportunity to reflect on the current status of CRT and what it offers to the development of conscientious, public interest advocacy.

The conference will examine available identity narratives in civil rights claims, looking at immigration law as a case study. Much attention has been paid to the substantive and political goals of immigration law and advocacy. This conference takes a step back to explore fundamental questions about the role and impact of immigrant law and lawyers. The panelists will explore the ways in which immigration law shapes individual and community identities; the role of immigration law in generating and perpetuating American identity myths; and the complicity of well-meaning lawyers in reproducing particular identity stereotypes to”fit”their clients into recognized legal claims.

The full program description is here.

The schedule is:

Thursday, April 16:
5:00-6:30pm  Keynote Address by Ian Haney López

Friday, April 17:
9:00am-3:30pm

Critical Race Studies: Past Promises, Future Prospects
Featuring:  Frances Ansley, Harlon Dalton, Margaret Montoya, and Angela Onwuachi-Willig


Critical Reflections on Contemporary Immigration Law
Featuring:  Muneer Ahmad, Kevin R. Johnson, Mae Ngai, and Michael Wishnie


Clinical Education: Integrating Theory & Practice
Featuring:  Anthony Alfieri, Sameer Ashar, Kristin Henning, and Hope Metcalf


Student workshop to follow.

Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on “Frontiers in Social Justice Lawyering: Critical Race Revisited,” April 16-17, 2009

Trim and Transform? Not That Again…

 This network television ad for the Schick Quattro TrimStyle for Women razor proclaims, “Now it’s easy to shave, trim and transform with just a flip of a handle, whatever your style.”  A female runner passes three small bushes that go from unkempt to roundly trimmed.  As a woman in a bikini walks pool-side past a potted plant, it goes from wild and ungroomed to a neat rectangular strip.

Circular, triangular, rectangular, oval and square — “whatever your style” — as long as it’s not natural, according to this commercial, it would seem.  Ok, so it is a razor ad, after all, so it’s not like I expected Schick to take a pro growth position.  Nevertheless, this ad’s not-so-subtle hints that we should all get to trimming did take me by surprise.  It’s just more evidence of how porn culture has become mainstream culture.  Related posts here and here.

H/T to Sharon I. Berger

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture | 2 Comments

“In fiscal 2008, the department received a total of 2,908 reports of sexual assault involving service members, representing an eight percent increase from fiscal 2007.”

Quote pulled from this DOD press release, which provides an overview of this DOD report. Excerpt from Executive Summary below:

– Aggregate Report of Sexual Assault Incidents: In FY08 there were 2,908
reports of sexual assault involving Military Service members:
-There were 2,265 Unrestricted Reports involving Military Service
members. 1,594 (70%) of these reports had Military Service members as
victims. Some of these reports included more than one victim resulting in a
total of 1,752 Service members victims in the Unrestricted Reports
received.
– Service member victims made 753 Restricted Reports of sexual assault.
Fifteen percent (110) of victims that made Restricted Reports decided to
change to an Unrestricted Report and participate in a criminal investigation.
As a result of the change, 643 remained as Restricted Reports.
– The Military Services completed a total of 2,389 criminal investigations on
reports made during and prior to FY08, which involved 2,763 subjects.

Via. A study last year found that 15% U.S. veterans suffered sexual trauma.   Nan Hunter blogged here about the pressure on U.S. servicewomen not to report sexual assualts. Kathleen Bergin blogged about the issue here. Two years ago I did a related retrospective link round up here.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Feminism and the Workplace | Comments Off on “In fiscal 2008, the department received a total of 2,908 reports of sexual assault involving service members, representing an eight percent increase from fiscal 2007.”

Link Round-up “Recession, job loss & their economic impact on women”

Here, via Jill Zimon.

Share
Posted in Feminist Blogs Of Interest, Women and Economics | Comments Off on Link Round-up “Recession, job loss & their economic impact on women”

“The [New York Times’] policy says the newspaper will not allow personal or partisan attacks from behind a mask of anonymity.”

The NYT’s Public Editor criticizes the paper for failing to live up to this policy here.

Share
Posted in Justice? | Comments Off on “The [New York Times’] policy says the newspaper will not allow personal or partisan attacks from behind a mask of anonymity.”

Debunking the Myth of LGBT Affluence

UCLA’s Williams Institute came out with a new study of poverty among the lesbian, gay, and bisexual community this past Friday. Notwithstanding the general perception of lesbians, gays, and bisexuals as an affluent minority group–a perception that, it is worth noting, the community has itself actively fostered–the study found that poverty is at least as common among lesbians, gays, and bisexuals as it is among heterosexuals. Here are the main findings of the study (which are directly quoted from p. i of the study):

  1. After adjusting for a range of family characteristics that help explain poverty, gay and lesbian  couple families are significantly more likely to be poor than are heterosexual married couple  families.  
  2. Notably, lesbian couples and their families are much more likely to be poor than heterosexual  couples and their families.    
  3. Children in gay and lesbian couple households have poverty rates twice those of children in  heterosexual married couple households.  
  4. Within the LGB population, several groups are much more likely to be poor than others.   African  American people in same-sex couples and same-sex couples who live in rural areas are much  more likely to be poor than white or urban same-sex couples.  
  5. While a small percentage of all families receive government cash supports intended for poor and  low-income families, we find that gay and lesbian individuals and couples are more likely to  receive these supports than are heterosexuals.  

-Tony Infanti

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off on Debunking the Myth of LGBT Affluence

Arkansas Adoption Ban Case Survives Motion to Dismiss

The ACLU’s challenge to the ban on adoption and foster parenting by cohabiting unmarried couples, which was approved by Arkansas voters last November, survived a motion to dismiss this week. As with similar bans in Alabama, Mississippi, Utah, and North Dakota, the best interests of children are being sacrificed by the ban’s supporters in order to score a win in the “culture wars” and, more specifically, to prevent the formation or completion of lesbian and gay families.

The history of the Arkansas initiative is tortuous.  In 1999, the Arkansas Child Welfare Agency Review Board promulgated a regulation prohibiting an individual from serving as a foster parent”if any adult member of that person’s household is a homosexual.”In 2006, the Arkansas Supreme Court struck this regulation down as a violation of the separation of powers under the state constitution. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Howard, 238 S.W.3d 1 (Ark. 2006).  Early in 2007, Arkansas lawmakers considered legislation that would have replaced the board’s ban on foster parenting by lesbian and gay men:and would have added to it a ban on adoption by lesbians and gay men. However, after passing the Arkansas Senate, this legislation died in the Arkansas House of Representatives. Last year’s ballot initiative was an attempt to bring this same measure directly to Arkansas voters.

In a ruling from the bench, the judge in Cole v. Arkansas  dismissed a challenge to the title of the ballot initiative, but allowed the remainder of the lawsuit to proceed to trial. The trial is scheduled to begin December 7 and is expected to last two weeks.

-Tony Infanti

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Arkansas Adoption Ban Case Survives Motion to Dismiss

New Ani DiFranco Song “November 4, 2008”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, Feminism and the Arts | Comments Off on New Ani DiFranco Song “November 4, 2008”

“Southern Chiconomics”

One of my fantastic former students has a cool new blog!

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Legal Profession, South Carolina, Women and Economics | Comments Off on “Southern Chiconomics”

“Images of Masculinity in Disney Films”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media | 1 Comment

“Lorraine Hansberry’s Gay Politics: Why the ‘Raisin in the Sun’ playwright’s homosexual ties have been straight-washed from black history.”

That’s the title of this essay at The Root. Via.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, LGBT Rights | Comments Off on “Lorraine Hansberry’s Gay Politics: Why the ‘Raisin in the Sun’ playwright’s homosexual ties have been straight-washed from black history.”

John Yoo and Jesse Choper on Gay Marriage

I’ve long maintained the following:   as unwaveringly committed as I am to being pro-choice and anti-death penalty, I can understand the arguments on the other side.   I completely disagree with them, but I get the logic behind the arguments.   On gay marriage, it’s completely different though.   I have yet to hear an argument against gay marriage that makes one ounce of sense to me.   I’m open to at least trying to understand the arguments against it, but so far not one has fit that bill.   They’re all completely nonsensical.   Damages children?   Nope.   Ruins marriage for straight people?   Are you kidding me?   It’s gross?   Yeah, just like the wonderful sex life of all your straight friends that you want to hear complete details about.   The Bible doesn’t like it?   Move to a different country that follows the Bible.   And so forth.

In light of that, it was nice this morning to see in my daily Westclip email an article about gay marriage and the conservative movement in which one of the most prominent conservative scholars today, John Yoo, took a similar position.   The article (“Can the Government Prohibit Gay Marriage” here via Westlaw), co-authored with Jesse Choper (I don’t know his politics, although I probably should), argues that, although the constitution does not guarantee the right, the federal government doesn’t have the power to prohibit gay marriage.   That part isn’t surprising from a conservative.

However, the last part of the paper is.   It argues that states should not, as a policy matter, ban gay marriage.   The arguments are those that gay rights advocates have been making for decades:

How should an individual state decide the question of gay marriage for itself? Our view is that it should not prohibit gay marriage. States should generally exercise their police power when the social benefit of a regulation outweighs any harm that it may generate. With regard to gay marriage, the cost of a prohibition is the restriction of the liberty of two individuals of the same sex who seek the same legal status for an intimate relationship that is available to individuals of different sexes. This harm may not be restricted just to the individuals involved but may also involve broader social costs. If the government believes that marriage has positive benefits for society, some or all of those benefits may attach to same-sex marriages as well. Stable relationships may produce more personal income and less demands on welfare and unemployment programs; it may create the best conditions for the rearing of children; and it may encourage individuals to invest and save for the future.

On the other side of the ledger, does prohibiting gay marriage create any social benefits that would outweigh the positive consequences of permitting it? We are not aware of any evidence that the marriage of two individuals of the same sex produces any tangible, direct harm to anyone either in the marriage or outside of it. As we understand it, the claim against gay marriage is that it produces negative externalities on those outside of the marriage. First is the contention that gay marriage undermines the institution of marriage, a point often advanced by opponents and mentioned by the Supreme Court itself in Lawrence. The causal link must be that allowing same-sex couples to marry will reduce the respect for the institution of marriage sufficiently that marriage among heterosexual couples will decline. We know of no empirical studies that bear out this relationship.   ****

A second rationale in favor of a ban is that gay marriage provides legitimacy to gay relationships, and this is offensive to significant portions of the American people. Here, the harm is not tangible but rather is psychological. Even though the marriage itself does no harm to third parties, these others experience a cost just by knowing that gay marriages exist in their state or nation. ****

Our approach to the policy issue of gay marriage adopts the harm principle, which urges against government prohibition of any private activity which does not harm any other. It may be that some believe gay marriage to be immoral or offensive, but if it causes no direct harm to others beyond the psychological, we believe a legislature should not ban it. **** Our position here is that without persuasive evidence about the direct harms caused by gay marriage, we would not choose a policy to ban it.

With all the news about John Yoo these days, it’s quite a welcome surprise to find such a prominent player in the current conservative world making these arguments.

– David S. Cohen

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on John Yoo and Jesse Choper on Gay Marriage

What’s with all the new movies in which the woman has to fix herself so that she may be loved by a man?

That’s what Emma Rosenblum asks here in NY Magazine, writing in part:

… Since Sex and the City, a woman has become the central protagonist in a genre that used to have two (so instead of Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn, you get Carrie and … her computer). Thus, these women have to follow the logical course of main characters:learn, change, grow:alone. The men? They’re just fine as is. In New in Town, Renée Zellweger plays a driven careerist who moves to a small town to revamp the local factory, where she meets union rep Harry Connick Jr. The moment comes only after Zellweger’s cold heart has been melted by the superfriendly town. In He’s Just Not That Into You, Jennifer Aniston, long-suffering girlfriend of marriage-phobic Ben Affleck, gets a proposal only after deciding she doesn’t need marriage. In Confessions of a Shopaholic, Isla Fisher is a debt-laden journalist who falls for her editor, who can’t reciprocate until she’s given up her expensive shopping habits. …

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Sexism in the Media, The Overrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on What’s with all the new movies in which the woman has to fix herself so that she may be loved by a man?

“Sophie Germain – Revolutionary Mathematician”

Interesting post about Sophie Germain here at Angry for a Reason, below is an excerpt:

In 1794 the École Polytechnique opened in Paris. It’s mission statement was to”train mathematicians and scientists for the country”(Perl 64). The school did not admit women, but as with her earlier studies, she didn’t let this obstacle stop her from learning even though she could not physically sit in on the classes. She was able to obtain the lecture notes from students in the classes and would send comments to the professors, which would at times include original notes on mathematics problems, but unlike other students she had to use a pseudonym to disguise her femaleness. And so Sophie became M. le Blanc.

During this time she became especially interested in the work of one professor, Joseph-Louis Lagrange. Lagrange was so impressed by her work that he insisted upon meeting the student who had produced it. * Upon discovering that it was a woman who had created it he was surprised, but not put off by it. He praised her for her analysis and would continue to support her and her work, becoming a mentor and a friend. Such encouragement from such a prominent mathematician energized Sophie and gave her more confidence in her work as a mathematician. With this newfound confidence Sophie moved from solving problems in her course work and into studying unexplored areas of mathematics. It was at this point that she became aware of Fermat’s Last Theorem**. Fermat’s Last Theorem continues to puzzle mathematicians to this day. It states that there are no solutions to equations of the form x^n+y^n=z^n where n ≥ 3.

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminist Blogs Of Interest, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on “Sophie Germain – Revolutionary Mathematician”

“Feminism 101: On Language and the Commodification of Sex Via Humor”

Melissa lays it out here, noting:

[O]ne of the most common themes among the emails I get is gratitude for expressing frustration or contempt or anger at something of which, women have been told in explicit or implicit ways, our jovial and uncomplaining acquiesce is expected. Thank you for saying it’s not funny. That something has always bothered me. It’s an expression of relief that someone has said publicly what they’ve felt privately:and maybe never said to anyone for fear of reprisal, for fear of being told they are humorless, hypersensitive, over-reactionary, boring.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminist Blogs Of Interest, Sociolinguistics | Comments Off on “Feminism 101: On Language and the Commodification of Sex Via Humor”

Teen Suicide Linked to Cyberbullying

From here:

The image was blurred and the voice distorted, but the words spoken by a young Ohio woman are haunting. She had sent nude pictures of herself to a boyfriend. When they broke up, he sent them to other high school girls. The girls were harassing her, calling her a slut and a whore. She was miserable and depressed, afraid even to go to school.

And now Jesse Logan was going on a Cincinnati television station to tell her story. Her purpose was simple:”I just want to make sure no one else will have to go through this again.”

The interview was in May 2008. Two months later, Jesse Logan hanged herself in her bedroom. She was 18.

An “internet security expert” is quoted in the linked article for the proposition that: “Forty-four percent of the boys say that they’ve seen sexual images of girls in their school, and about 15 percent of them are disseminating those images when they break up with the girls.” As far as I can tell from little bit of research, a few of the kids who disseminate nude photos of underage peers, or in some cases themselves, are punished harshly, while most are not sanctioned at all. This article reports:

After his former girlfriend taunted him, Phillip Alpert remembered the nude photos she e-mailed to him while they were dating.

He took revenge with an electronic blast : e-mailing the photos of the 16-year-old girl to more than 70 people, including her parents, grandparents and teachers.

Three days later, Alpert, then 18, was charged with transmitting child pornography. Today Alpert is serving five years of probation for the crime, and he is registered as a sex offender : a label he must carry at least until he is 43.

“I didn’t know how bad of a decision it was,” Alpert, now 19, said recently at his MetroWest apartment. “I don’t think it’s fair.”

And:

Just last month, a 15-year-old Pennsylvania girl was charged with creating child pornography for sending images of herself via MySpace to a 27-year-old man.

Also last month, a Brevard County teen was jailed after forwarding a cell-phone picture of his 16-year-old ex-girlfriend’s naked breasts to another teen. The girlfriend allowed the photo to be taken while the two were dating, police said.

Bryce Dixon, 18, told investigators he sent the photo because he thought the girl had cheated on him with his best friend. He said he knew that sending the photo would make her mad.

A judge set Dixon’s bail at $140,000 for charges he faced, including transmission of child pornography.

But the teens who circulated the pictures of Jesse Logan and bullied her literally to death have apparently not been punished by their school, or by anyone else.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and Technology, Justice? | Comments Off on Teen Suicide Linked to Cyberbullying

The first all-female, all African American crew to operate a commercial flight:

null
(From top, left) Captain Rachelle Jones, First Officer Stephanie Grant and flight attendants Diana Galloway and Robin Rogers.

The AFL-CIO NOW blog reports:

Last month, when first officer Stephanie Grant of Atlantic Southeast Airlines got the call to replace the co-pilot scheduled to crew Flight No. 5202 from Atlanta to Nashville, she didn’t realize she and the rest of the crew were about to make history.

But Grant, along with Capt. Rachelle Jones, both members of the Airline Pilots (ALPA), and flight attendants Diana Galloway and Robin Rogers, both members of AFA-CWA, became the first all-female, all African American crew to operate a commercial flight. Coincidentally, it happened during Black History Month.

Grant told Atlanta’s WXIA TV:

“When I got to the cockpit and I saw Rachelle–we just met a few weeks prior–I was just ecstatic when I saw her in there.”

At first, Rogers said:

“We did not realize the historic ramifications of it. We were just like, OK, this is going to be fun.”

But, Jones, a former Delta Airlines customer service agent and one of just 10 African American women airline captains in the country, recalled thinking:

“This could be a first, so let’s be on our P’s and Q’s.”

Galloway said the thrill of working together put:

“…a little more pep in our step. I think we were just so proud.”   …

Via The Fabulous Froomkin.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Firsts, Race and Racism, Travels | Comments Off on The first all-female, all African American crew to operate a commercial flight:

Multiple Anxieties: Breaching Race, Class & Gender Norms With Assisted Reproduction

Lolita Buckner Inniss (Cleveland-Marshall, Ain’t I a Feminist Legal Scholar, Too?, Visiting Prof at Pace Law School) and I have posted to SSRN our working paper, Multiple Anxieties: Breaching Race, Class and Gender Norms With Assisted Reproduction.  Here is the abstract:

Nadya Suleman and her octuplets are the vehicles through which Americans express their anxiety about race, class and gender.  Expressions of concern for the health of children, the mother’s well-being, the future of reproductive medicine or the financial drain on taxpayers barely conceal deep impulses towards racism, sexism and classism.  This essay describes eight socio-legal anxieties that coalesce in response to Suleman’s story: (1) race and racial hierarchies; (2) the contingency of white privilege; (3) the nature of white motherhood; (4) the role of doctors as agents of the state; (5) reproductive technology and class; (6) bodily perfection and class markers; (7) the bounds of the traditional family; and (8) geographical differences.

The bounds of tolerance strain and break when individual autonomy collides with majoritarian notions of civic and moral virtue. Derision of Suleman reveals the limitations of tolerance for women who deviate from prescribed norms, including norms of “choice.“  Suleman’s story is not just about multiple births, then, but about society’s multiple anxieties when a woman breaches the bounds of racial, class and gender expectations.

The full paper is available here.

This is one of those projects that started as a casual conversation and took on a life of its own … and the reason that having visiting colleagues is a great privilege!  

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Families, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Race and Racism, Reproductive Rights, The Overrepresentation of Women, Women and Economics, Women's Health | Comments Off on Multiple Anxieties: Breaching Race, Class & Gender Norms With Assisted Reproduction

Is Women’s History Month History?

Did you know that each year the National Women’s History Project establishes a theme for Women’s History month?  I didn’t.  This year’s theme is “Women taking the lead to save our planet.”  

I don’t know if it is me, my neighborhood, my school or my writing cycle (I’ve been so busy that I’ve barely done anything else in the last few weeks), but I haven’t seen any advertising for a single “live” celebration/exhibit/concert in celebration of Women’s History Month.  (Then again, maybe I just answered my own question about why I haven’t seen any . . . I haven’t been looking up from the Bluebook.)

Is women’s history passe?  Considered “uncool,” as if we don’t need to study the past?  We have enough accomplished women’s so we don’t need to search the past for heroes?  I, for one, failed miserable at the  women’s history test here.  

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminist Legal History | Comments Off on Is Women’s History Month History?

LGBT Rights as Human Rights

With all of the focus on the AIG bonuses, an important bit of news might have escaped attention today. The Obama administration once again has broken with the Bush administration. This time, by signing on to the UN Statement on “Human Rights, Sexual Orientation, and Gender Identity.” For a prior post describing this statement, see here.  

-Tony Infanti

Share
Posted in LGBT Rights | Comments Off on LGBT Rights as Human Rights

Two Interesting Conferences Slated for April 8th

Reproductive and Sexual Health and the African Women’s Protocol at the Washington and Lee University School of Law in Lexington, Virginia, and CEDAW and Its Optional Protocol at the New England Law School in   Boston, Massachusetts. More information here.
Share
Posted in Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on Two Interesting Conferences Slated for April 8th

Interview With “Gay Conversion” Pastor

I thought this was hilarious, your mileage may vary…

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in It's satire, in case that requires pointing out, LGBT Rights | Comments Off on Interview With “Gay Conversion” Pastor

Report on Global Arc of Justice Conference

Last week the Williams Institute and the International Lesbian and Gay Law Association convened the Global Arc of Justice Conference in Los Angeles.   With participants from forty countries, the conference seems to be the most nationally-diverse gathering of LGBT scholars, judges, lawyers and activists ever.   Such conferences often attract participants from the global north, but Brad Sears of the Williams Institute and David Cruz of USC Law School (President of ILGLAW) did an amazing job and arranging for a fantastically diverse group of people. With constant translation between Spanish and English, the conference gave the attending lawyers, activists, and scholars a unique chance to connect over rights struggles throughout the world.   The multiplicity of both regional and themed panels gave participants the ability to aqcuire direct knowledge of the work going on in other countries.

 

Highlights included the panel of supreme court justices from Argentina, Australia and Nepal, in which the judges conveyed differing approaches to sexuality and gender issues before their courts.   Justice Michael Kirby of Australia’s High Court, probably the only openly gay supreme court justice in the world, was particularly eloquent about his role as he steps down from the court due to a mandatory retirement.

 

Stories of persecution and resistance abounded.   Of note, Moroccan civil rights lawyer  Abdelaziz   Nouaydi discussed his representation of the family of a man persecuted both by the press and riotous crowds for having conducted a wedding in his family home in which he wore a bridal gown.   Here‘s part one of a five-part YouTube video on the story.

 

-Darren Rosenblum

Share
Posted in Legal Profession, LGBT Rights, Sisters In Other Nations | Comments Off on Report on Global Arc of Justice Conference