Used Awd Cars With Good Gas Mileage, Vizion Plus Seriale Familja E Madhe, Discord Packing Script No N Word, Bill Gleason Obituary, Articles L

They want pure milk easy to digest, soothing, warms their tummy, meets their needs, gives comfort, nourishes them and helps them grow. Though its not nearly as esoteric and egghead as supralapsarianism vs. infralapsarianism. I dont even think PSA is limited to Calvinists- Lutherans believe it too, right? whats wrong with mess anyway? Calvinism may be cool right now, but it doesnt reflect the God I have known and loved for over 40 years. 1554-1612), who was trained in theology in a university (Cambridge), and Thomas Helwys (ca. And those who might still reject it, might also be rejecting it for the wrong reasons and miss out on some important wrestling that could help them grow. And our needs are met by taking ground and accomplishing; because we were robbed of our inheritance and starved of purpose and significance. I dont have experience of dealing with, or helping someone else deal with, child sex abuse; and of course I dont have experience of being someone else. Or at least they start to think they have the powers and rights (divine?) I dont know how else God can allow his creation to be truly free, if he steps in each and every time somebody decides to hurt somebody else, or if He removes all evil from society all the time. I think that our doctrinal systems are mans attempt to understand based on what God has presented to us. So far, we both agree. I do believe that some brands have harmful elements that bring extra despair as if every day life doesnt bring enough. c) I want to move conversations about abuse beyond the Calvinism discussion because I think its a massive red herring. CALVIN! Anyway, I am not talking doctrine here. First of all, I agree with what Jeff S wrote about the word leaders. Also, even if I considered someone a leader, I dont march in lockstep with him/her. I went through what Calvinists themselves call the cage stage, meaning that young or new Calvinists belong in one. On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. To help clarify this, theologians for centuries have distinguished between primary and secondary causality. The farther away from direct, clear scripture I get, the more loosely I hold to ideas. I dont like people spewing proof texts, but let me give yo a verse anyway: For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face; now I know in part, but then I will know fully just as I also have been fully known.. Under that, Calvins page count is over 2400 pages of theological system, over TEN TIMES the length of a typical genre novel of the Seventies, over FIVE TIMES the length of a typical paperback today, and at least 2/3 the length of the Lord of the Rings. I just want an equal seat at the table. How can a bridge be built when the side you are attempting to reach constantly moves its shoreline back and forth in an effort to maintain its monolithic sovereignty as THE only standard of true Christian thought? Paige Patterson 18. Why did I smile? who needs systems & neat little boxes? At the Spiritual Sounding Board blog, in the threads about Calvinism, I saw Cals on occasion contradicting each other. Never once did I hear the word Calvin. The Reformed doctrine of salvation is commonly represented by the acrostic TULIP (also known as the five points of Calvinism ): T - total depravity. This is the reason I stopped reading JAs thread on Calvinism, and its the reason I will my best to stop reading this one. Remember, Calvinism is merely the invoking of associative meaning, not real meaning. This website helped me tremendously as a recovering Piperite, and Im so grateful that I dont have to believe that God CAUSED this illness for some mysterious glory. Yes, God WILL receive glory somehow from it, but thats not his grand purpose. He said I was wrong. So if you disagree with me, you must be doomed to hell as a heretic, since you contradict what God has put in my mind to say. What I DO think is clear is that God can use evil for good and he works all things for good of those with faith in him. Of course you are. No one likes to see (what they think is) a good doctrine maligned, especially if it leaves the real culprit at large. , @ Hester: Likewise, Hester, likewise! There was a reason we (the US) put in a Constitutional Amendment to term limit the president. I had no reason not to believe. I am spelling out what is being taught, at least to my untrained ear, under the name of Calvinism, in hopes that we can all learn to: a)recognize where we are coming from, and b) respect those with very different takes on these things as brothers, sisters, and seekers. My Comment was Deleted from what Ive seen here, youve always been a gentleman and tolerant of others who do not believe as you do. Ive lost track of the number of times in blog comments where it has been insisted that it means that we are as bad as we can be. Jeff B. I am sorry those times seemed to have been exchanged for dogma over Christian friendship. @ Daisy: He is still in a leadership position within the church. YOU are never in a position to disagree or agree with their orthodoxy. Id like to agree with both, if thats ok. We need exactly the right kind of nutrition at exactly the right kind, but maybe not the milky kind because we emerge from trauma both far too old and still too young. And yes, theology would say that God permitting evil gives us a chance to to good, but thats a hollow thing to tell a rape victim. held at Tremont Temple but occasionally at Park St. Church. As well as giving off a strong aroma of the No True Scotsman fallacy. I never minded using it in the past because it was just a shorthand for my views on what it means to be saved by grace; I wasnt really arguing with anyone, and I figured as shorthand, it was alright. Julie Anne: They want pure milk easy to digest, soothing, warms their tummy, meets their needs, gives comfort, nourishes them and helps them grow. And later, mamas milkexactly what they need at the precise time they need it., Nick: Some, myself included, who spent years in controlling and abusive churches would say that to be infantilised is the last thing we need.. I am much more hyper in my comments than they are. When RC said their are no rogue molecules in the universe, that implies to me that God directs even the smallest action, including the tongue. A brain tumor has already been successfully removed, which gives us hope for the next surgery (lung, rib, chest area) and the radiation/chemo to follow. Before you do, let me ask: would you take the same tone with another man, and do you believe your words honor God? I will not monopolize the conversation..I apologize for my run on posts. who needs systems & neat little boxes? Its very difficult and exhausting having a conversation with people who claim you never, ever get their views correct. But something has changed in the last number of years. And since they realize that their belief is based on purely subjective interpretations of scripture that require severe qualificationwell, much easier to get you to just concede their premises by couching them in theologically nebulous, but emotionally attractive (and manipulative), platitudes. Cheers you on. I was pointing out that this is an issue that goes beyond Reformed theology. . Just a few thoughts for you. Theres nothing wrong with pondering and wondering at the truths Jesus represents. Although I had been churched, I had rarely opened my Bible. You should see some of the other ixtian blogs. We are only talking about it in this thread because someone brought it up as a challenge to Reformed theology. No. But that doesnt mean that the beliefs are necessarily untrue. Again, this idea that humans had no will to act is not something that the WCF, RC Sproul, or any Calvinist I know believes. With no disrespect to the contributor who mentioned them in a recent thread here, knowing the four positions on divorce (if indeed one accepts there are four) cannot make me a good husband, any more than knowing the flashpoint and auto-ignition temperature of diesel makes me a better driver. This reminds me of what the guy in the videos (Refuting Calvinism video series) was saying in one video. What Julie Anne is saying is also elaborated by Christa Brown in chapter 46 of her book This Little Light as well as here: http://www.stopbaptistpredators.org/ravagedfaith.html, Hester, thank you for that word pictureit will lend an air of drama to my week . Jeff Swith respect, I have never asked anyone to shut up. The thread on JAs blog really threw me off kilter. My humble opinionyet supported by scripture, is that the doctrines of unconditional election, limited atonement, and meticulous sovereignity (the last is not a pillar) villify and slander the name and character of Christ. Although occasionally hurt by these accusations of heresy, he responds like a gentleman. For example, we should never, ever turn our backs on child sex abuse because the pastor in the church where it happened is one of our good buddies. Thank you! Is proud of you. We studied together, looked at what I think is a really good representation of what I (and my church) believes, and he rejects it. Some, myself included, who spent years in controlling and abusive churches would say that to be infantilised is the last thing we need. (But I always wondered why, if it was not His desire that any man should perish, that He also would create someone specifically for hell?? This was no emotional, short term thing. Hence, your free will is categorically subject to Gods absolute control (meaning, God allowing is functionally the exact same thing as Him not allowing; anything that happens happens as a direct function of his will, either via that positive (allowing) or the negative (not allowing)in either case, your free will is utterly under Gods sovereign control. (I mean, Star Trek?). No, not a few verses, and not Calvin, but what Scripture says consistently about election, predestination, Gods omniscience and omnipotence, Gods love, etc.? Agree. "A missionary is a qualified Christian sent out under the authority of a local church to an area of recognized need in order to pursue the work of the Great Commission." Philosophers (not necessarily Christian ones) have wrestled with these questions for thousands of years without any real answers. They tend to carry on for a long time about it and end up calling people heretic (Ive seen this done on both sides of the debate though ) as the conversation ensues. If the answer sometimes doesnt work then weve got more work to do Not really thinking things though. The ranks of well-known Arminians include historical and current day Roman Catholics, the Remonstrants of the 17th century and John and Charles Wesley. Open Discussion Page, 1 Corinthians 2:6-3:4Psalm 28:1-9Proverbs 20:24-25. (Cue Calvinists crowing in predestined triumph) If the Institutes were a lifes work, Id expect a little length. Its really beyond my comprehension, so I dont think about it too much. These accusations are often followed by the fact that although they cant explain away the opposing verses, nonetheless they know their view is the truth. Demand they defend their ideas. Calvinism did not start with John Calvin. B. (Well, maybe those who are committed to doing evil to others arent asking those questions, but). circles, and here are the things that were primary messages: 1) God predestines some for salvation, and some for hell. But maybe there is just too much pain and hurt for that to be possible. We each probably believe that the venue we hold to is the best and most accurate. I want people to love God and love their neighbors. Im not doubting what you say, but PLEASE (and this goes for everyone) try to document this type of thing. In other words, there are plenty of people who are not part of this movement. This is as it should be, imo. But it's hard to beat J. I. Packer in any theological camp. The writers did claim to believe much the same, though, even that church and state should work together with the church ruling and the state enforcing church rule. It doesnt conform to our sense of fairness and love. They never want to explain why what they believe brings God more glory than what you believe. All are welcome to participate. On a site that deals with domestic abuse, it can very easily for discussion to descend into man hating. list of non calvinist theologians. A group, rightly or wrongly, is defined by the fruit that we see (often the problem with Christianity in general, right?). Had childhood friends who were Nazarene and Presbyterian and myself., Plymouth Brethren. Groovy, man. Any small error can lead us on to some very large mistakes if we arent careful. A stupendously important point, Jeff. (Okay, back into lurk..later, yall!). Though it purports otherwise, its every bit as secular as the rest of them, as it has nothing to do with knowing the Father, and everything to do creating a theoretical specification for ones own ideal God. Along with the traditional stuff, I have the definitive collectio of Star Trek ornaments including the Borg Cube which says (when turned on) We are the Borg. CALVIN! Here is a link to a chart comparing Calvinism to Arminianism. I am not trying to hurt or be cruelI am trying to say that ideas must have basis, and one does not get to declare an idea and then refuse to defend it rationally by appealing to humanitys inherent inability to understand it, and THEN proceed to give examples of why what is a contradiction in the doctrine really isnt a contradiction. I was a Jesus Movement convert, too in 1972. I believe that I am endowed by my Creator with the power to put an end to the vast majority of human misery and suffering in this life It begins with me as a single drop in a vast ocean. He does not back down on what he believes, yet responds to such denunciations with a gentle manner. I dont want to do either of those things, and I dont want to argue about it any more. The Calvinist thought process is: God has foreordained every word I say, therefore, I cannot be wrong. Grew up in Arlington.Christian (immigrant) family. If we do, we must hang our heads in shame. Lin wrote: When I look at myself, I think of my own salvation from a TULIP perspective. Please, please, please, keep us posted on your son in law. There is one more point that I do want to make, though. I dont find that these scenarios were what Jesus intended. My theologys still up-in-the-air, and I dont care if it never comes down. For there, we will still be the created and He will still be the Creator. Accept that many Calvinists have never experienced a doctrinally rigorous, non-Calvinist church. That they are the sole divine recipients of truth, again. IMO he has helped destroy the Southern Baptist Convention, but no one dare tell him this. Every kindness & every meanness I do sends ripples outward and I birth the future by my words and deeds. Ah yes, those were the days A friend of mine came to the Lord while living in the hills above Santa Barbara in a teepee and smoking a lot of pot He and his wife were some of the most sane, grounded people I knew in the 80s. We can connect on our shared faith and heart for the abused. Advocate & Solicitor of the High Court of Malaya. (Sorry, elastigirl, but you were so honest about the kind of God we all want that I have to use your example.) I get what youre saying. I told her that I disagree with John Piper's take on this situation. Maybe Im wrong on that. What about what God foreordained someone else to say that is different. It is only required that we do not demean each other while in argument. When there is someone who has been really, REALLY busted up by a Calvinist, I completely get where the anger comes from. I grew out of it, something I hope the YRR does. It might not make people any more interested in Calvinism, but it just bothers me to see a doctrine rejected for the wrong reasons. He does not reject the Gospel, but he does reject predestination as presented by Calvin. They are his laws; they are not independent in nature. Each Christmas, I am thankful that God works in mysterious ways. I know. In fact, I recently wrote a song about it- some of the lyrics (this song could be titled ode to John Piper and his views on Divorce and Remarriage, but I did not quite go that far): So many people with big ideas who have it all figured out you'll occasionally see Calvinist doctrines pop up even among the occasional practitioner of any tradition. Hmmm all I can say is, it depends on the individual and in what way theyre hurting. If I had to pick one thing about them that signals danger to me, though, it would be what they dont act on, which is all those chickified wishy-washy decaffy gay things Jesus (and subsequently the apostles) said about love being The Main Thing. Michael Brown David Jeremiah Dave Hunt J. W. MacGorman E. Y. Mullins Herschel Hobbs W. T. Conner Frank Stagg Fisher Humphreys Bert Dominy Ken Keathley Norm Geisler Alister McGrath David Bentley Hart Mike Licona I accept with humility that there are things that I cannot understand. This might be where Romans 8:28 comes in, or the story of Joseph in the Old Testament. The 10 Best Non Calvinist Systematic Theology of 2022 Before making a purchase decision, we strongly recommend reading through the features of each Non Calvinist Systematic Theology and picking one that will work best for you. However i wish i wouldnt see this on a Pastor in order for me to chose a congregation in such denomination without fear of having a surprise, Eastern Orthodoxy Roman Catholicism Anglicanism(One is allowed to be a Calvinist soteriologically, and some exist, but it is a minority position) Lutherans(although they might similar to one who does not know the nuances of their doctrine) Methodists, Certain Baptists(Although Baptists have their roots in Zwinglian Calvinism, and are doctrinally incoherent when they reject it) Charismatics(due to the fact they are doctrinally incoherent when it comes to these things, you can technically say they are not Calvinists). How do you know that this, in fact, is what the Bible did and is not what God IS like? But my point wasnt to proof text Calvin. Their scholarship seems smug and oddly ineffectual (quoted by one mother) and yes, it later became apparent that The Way was actually doctrinally aberrant and yet through this article you were drawn to Jesus, so maybe this suggests God sometimes uses unlikely means to create new believers? I think this is a bigger issue than Calvinism- its one fundamental to Christianity. Cant wait to read the comments section of Dees forthcoming post to Calvinists. Right after I became a Christian, I purchased Jesus Christ Superstar! My experience has been that someone who adheres to Calvinism always shows up on a blog to defend it/him when they happen upon someone they feel is misrepresenting him/it. Many Christian Protestant denominations trace their roots to John Calvin and the reformation movement. Ive been lurking through out this discussion. They should not get to define theology that has been around much longer than them. Jeff, whether it was my misperceptions or real perceptions of the doctrine that you hold dear to your heart, someone trying to correct my faulty ideas of Calvinism isnt going to benefit me whatsoever if I am at the emotional/spiritual end of my rope.