The 64 Democrats on the Wrong Side of Stupak-Pitts

The Democrats who voted “Aye” on the Stupak-Pitts Amendment:

AL-2 Bright, Bobby; AL- 5 Griffith, Parker; AL-7 Davis, Artur; AR-1 Berry, Robert; AR-2 Snyder, Victor; AR-4 AR-4 Ross, Mike; CA-18 Cardoza, Dennis; CA-20 Costa, Jim; CA-43 Baca, Joe; CO-3 Salazar, John.

GA-2 Bishop, Sanford; GA-8 Marshall, James; GA-12 Barrow, John; KY-6 Chandler, Ben; IL-3 Lipinski, Daniel; IL-12 Costello, Jerry; IN-2 Donnelly, Joe; IN-8 Ellsworth, Brad; IN-9 Hill, Baron; LA-3 Melancon, Charles; ME-2 Michaud, Michael.

MA-2 Neal, Richard; MA-9 Lynch, Stephen; MI-5 Kildee, Dale; MI-1 Stupak, Bart; MN-7 Peterson, Collin; MN-8 Oberstar, James; MS-1 Childers, Travis; MS-4 Taylor, Gene; MO-4 Skelton, Ike; NM-2 Teague, Harry

NC-2 Etheridge, Bob; NC-7 McIntyre, Mike; NC-11 Shuler, Heath; ND Pomeroy, Earl; OH-1 Driehaus, Steve; OH-6 Wilson, Charles;  OH-9 Kaptur, Marcy; OH-16 Boccieri, John; OH-17 Ryan, Timothy; OH-18 Space, Zachary.

OK-2 Boren, Dan; PA-3 Dahlkemper, Kathleen; PA-4 Altmire, Jason; PA-10 Carney, Christopher; PA-11 Kanjorski, Paul; PA-12 Murtha, John; PA-14 Doyle, Michael; PA-17 Holden, Tim; RI-2 Langevin, James

SC-5 Spratt, John; TN-4 Davis, Lincoln; TN-5 Cooper, Jim; TN-6 Gordon, Barton; TN-8 Tanner, John; TX-16 Reyes, Silvestre; TX-23 Rodriguez, Ciro; TX-27 Ortiz, Solomon; TX-28 Cuellar, Henry.

UT-2 Matheson, Jim; VA-5 Perriello, Thomas; WV-1 Mollohan, Alan; WV-3 Rahall, Nick; WI-7 Obey, David.

Via.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and Politics, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on The 64 Democrats on the Wrong Side of Stupak-Pitts

Vani K. Borooah, Quy Toan Do, Sriya Iyer, and Shareen Joshi – “Missing Women and India’s Religious Demography”

Abstract:
The authors use recent data from the 2006 National Family Health Survey of India to explore the relationship between religion and demographic behavior. They find that fertility and mortality vary not only between religious groups, but also across caste groups. These groups also differ with respect to socio-economic status. The central finding of this paper is that despite their socio-economic disadvantages, Muslims have higher fertility than their Hindu counterparts and also exhibit lower levels of infant mortality (particularly female infant mortality). This effect is robust to the inclusion of controls for non-religious factors such as socio-economic status and area of residence. This result has important policy implications because it suggests that India’s problem of “missing women” may be concentrated in particular groups. The authors conclude that religion and caste play a key role in determining the demographic characteristics of India.

Downloadable here.

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Feminism and Economics, Sisters In Other Nations, The Overrepresentation of Women, Women and Economics, Women's Health | Comments Off on Vani K. Borooah, Quy Toan Do, Sriya Iyer, and Shareen Joshi – “Missing Women and India’s Religious Demography”

Don’t believe anyone who tells you to put mints in your vagina.

Does hatred of women know no boundaries? Apparently not:

I recently got a press release from the makers of Linger, an “internal feminine flavoring” that promises to keep your vagina in mint condition. Think of it as an Altoid for your lady parts or, as its website explains, “A small, naturally sweetened flavoring, free of artificial dyes, which was created to flavor the secretions of a woman when she is sexually aroused.” What…the…?! …

… So how does Linger manage to pass off breath mints as vaginal Tic Tacs in $7.99 packs? Despite the salacious creation story and testimonials on its site (“It gets a little warm as it starts to dissolve which took just under an hour. Then, it is SO good!!”), the mint is labeled “for novelty use only.” This is a common practice in the sex-products industry, explains Charlie Glickman, the education program manager at Good Vibrations. It gives manufacturers some cover if something goes awry, he explains. “They could say, ‘It’s just a novelty toy. You weren’t actually expecting to use this were you?'” And if you actually do expect to use Linger to “flavor the woman in a manner that is safe and effective,” be warned: its primary ingredient is sugar, which is not safe for the vagina. It messes up the pH and can lead to a really painful yeast infection, a condition that definitely doesn’t make someone want to “linger.”

I’d advocate agreeing to insert a mint only after a male partner leads by example.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, If you're a woman, Women's Health | 4 Comments

I’m completely dumbfounded.

By this. WARNING: Really horrible, proceed with caution. NB: Haven’t done any research to confirm the site’s legitimacy or the accuracy of the info, so caveat link clicker.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Legal Profession | Comments Off on I’m completely dumbfounded.

Attention.

null

Via.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer, Feminism and Animal Law | Comments Off on Attention.

Recipe Correction

Via.

Share
Posted in Bloggenpheffer | Comments Off on Recipe Correction

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | Comments Off on

On Forging Sustainable Parental Bonds.

Last Sunday’s New York Times Magazine cover story, Who Knew I was Not the Father?, discusses the complexities of identifying which men to label as”fathers.” The article told the heartbreaking stories of men who believed that they were the biological fathers of children they had raised for years only to find out later that they were not. The men felt betrayed by their former wives or partners, the children were often wounded by the sudden disappearance of the man they knew as their father, and the fathers who remained involved had to rebuild the relationship with the child, often without certainty that the law would continue to recognize their parental status. The article suggested mandatory paternity testiing at birth as a way to deal with an era of reliable genetic testing and unreliable parternships;”[i]n other words, the same care that hospitals take ensuring that the right mother is connected to the right newborn : footprints, matching ID bands, guarded nurseries, surveillance cameras : should be taken to verify that the right man is deemed father.”

We read the article with a shock of recognition. In a 2003 article, Which Ties Bind? Redefining The Parent-Child Relationship In An Age Of Genetic Certainty, 11 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 1011 (2003), we suggested, after a lengthy review of the cases, that couples who wanted the relationship to last rarely inquired too closely about paternity, while at least one of separating couples had a powerful incentive to find out the truth. Yet, parent-child relationships based on the truth had a better chance of surviving than those based on falsehood. We wrote: The only way to forge parental bonds likely to survive the child’s minority therefore is to treat the issue of parenthood separately from the issue of partnership. As a modest effort in this direction, we propose modifying existing law to require mandatory paternity, or second parent, determination at birth. We then concluded that the law should encourage establishing paternity as part of the child’s record, and that waivers should be allowed only where both parents clearly understood that they were forever foregoing the opportunity to challenge the father’s parental status.

We thought it was a good idea then, and we still do.

–June Carbone and Naomi Cahn

Share
Posted in Feminism and Families, Feminism and Law, Feminism and Technology, Feminist Legal Scholarship | 2 Comments

Alliance for Justice Requests Support for Dawn Johnsen

Via Shaun Shaughnessy, this request from Nan Aron at the Alliance for Justice:

Alliance for Justice has been asked to circulate a national sign-on letter in support of the nomination of Dawn Johnsen to lead the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel.  We are pleased to share this letter with you as her nomination has languished for more than  eight months, and it is critical that we fill this important  executive branch position.


As you well know, the Office of Legal Counsel plays a critical role in protecting our constitutional rights.   It tells the President and the rest of the executive branch whether proposed  policies, executive orders, and other actions are within the Constitution and the law.


Dawn Johnsen, who is currently  on faculty at the Maurer School of Law at Indiana University in Bloomington, is eminently qualified to head this office.   She has practical experience, legal expertise,  proven judgment and independence.   Moreover, she has support  from  an impressive bipartisan group of former Administration officials, including: Walter Dellinger, Solicitor General and head of the Office of Legal Counsel under President Clinton; Doug Kmiec, head of the Office under George H. W. Bush; Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell; and Brad Berenson, who served in George W. Bush’s White House Counsel’s office.


Dawn Johnsen also has support from a majority in the Senate. Unfortunately, her nomination, along with many others, is being  delayed. This obstruction interferes with the ability of the Obama administration to serve critical public needs and it defies the typical deference that is accorded presidents to fill their administration with individuals of their choosing.


I hope you will join the growing chorus of legal luminaries like yourself who are calling upon Senate  Majority Leader Harry  Reid to bring this nomination to a vote at the earliest possible date.


Click here to learn more about Dawn Johnsen or to express your interest in joining this letter.


-Posted by Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics | Comments Off on Alliance for Justice Requests Support for Dawn Johnsen

Guest Blogger Deborah Zipf on NOW New York State Conference

NOW’s New York state conference, held last month at the Crowne Plaza in White Plains, could make me cry.  Thirty years ago there were   hundreds of women, passionate arguments, sweet sisterhood, vicious infighting,   consciousness raising, contested elections, accusations, vegetarians (!), lesbians (!!) and the glorious feeling that we were changing the world at that very moment.   How could we transfer, to today’s generation, that much excitement, that much power?

There’s still fight left in the sixty-some who attended.   Oddly, we are not much comforted by the statistics – women making up half, more than half, of the enrollments in colleges, law schools, medical schools.   Our tired-out daughters, juggling babies and professorships, have neither time nor strength to keep up the fight.   Why don’t they see that, when something bad happens (tenure denied), the fault is systemic – not theirs?   They’re going to lose – from sheer exhaustion.

Current president Marcia Pappas with no staff at all fools the folks in Albany into thinking she has a staff of ten   She is so appreciated that members tried to change the bylaws and keep her forever.   (They also tried to delete the quorum rule but the motion failed.   And true to form, somebody moved to suspend the bylaws.)   Former state presidents Marilyn Fitterman and Noreen Connell were honored.   Speaker Ellen Snortland argued for teaching self defense so that it becomes as automatic to our children as buckling their seatbelts and entertained us with her mother/daughter stories.

High point?   A discussion, in lively NOW tradition, of the stand NOW should take on the burqa.

Muslim women’s organizations have asked for NOW’s support.   We stumbled, briefly, over whether we should support a cultural tradition or oppose a health hazard.   At the end of the hour, it’s a question of coercion and we oppose it.

The crying part comes because we know where we are, we know what it took to get our daughters where they are now, and we know – or think we know – how precarious it all is. I don’t think we made any mistakes (or not many) along the way – and I think, when NOW isn’t out there anymore, that the next generation will pay high price.

– Deborah Zipf

Deborah Zipf is a graduate of Middlebury College.  She is active in local non-profit advocacy organizations and city political groups in White Plains, New York.  Ms. Zipf coordinates graduate program admissions at Pace Law School and generally ensures that the department functions smoothly.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Politics, Guest Blogger | 1 Comment

“Criminologist helped get sex slave out of prison”

From this article:

… [Maria] Suarez’s horrifying experience : imprisoned from the age of 16 for five years in the home of a 67-year-old Azusa man who repeatedly raped her : reveals how she slipped through several cracks. It also shows how, subsequently, she was betrayed by a justice system that instead of aiding her put her behind bars for life.

But her case also reveals a ray of hope. That’s because someone – Elizabeth Dermody Leonard – was paying attention. And she helped kick off the process that would eventually free Suarez, now 49. …

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Feminism and Law, Feminists in Academia, Immigration | Comments Off on “Criminologist helped get sex slave out of prison”

This is taking things a bit too far…

null

Via.

Share
Posted in Baconpheffer | 2 Comments

Chris Matthews Takes on Abortion and the Catholic Church

Chris Matthews does a great job skewering the Rhode Island bishop who denied Patrick Kennedy communion. With apologies for linking to the videos as posted by Americans United for Life (it was the only version I could figure out to embed here), the exchange is below.   Or you can go directly to MSNBC’s website and view the interview here.

– David S. Cohen

Share
Posted in Feminism and Religion, Reproductive Rights | Comments Off on Chris Matthews Takes on Abortion and the Catholic Church

“Sex and Scoliosis”

Really informative, interesting post by this title here at the FWD/Forward blog.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Medicine, Feminist Blogs Of Interest, Women's Health | Comments Off on “Sex and Scoliosis”

Where are the Women? Speaking at Pace Law School

Postcard

Reading postings on FemLawProfs made me look at the faculty colloquia series I organized for Pace Law School this year.   Without any intention, we’ve scheduled 10 women and 9 men.     I don’t think exact parity is necessary for good intellectual exchange, but it certainly reflects that it’s far from impossible to schedule compelling scholars with gender balance.

-Darren Rosenblum

Share
Posted in Academia | 1 Comment

Student Protests at UC Berkeley Campus

Keep your eyes and ears open for news of what is happening right now at UC Berkeley’s Wheeler Hall (not part of the Law School).  There are unconfirmed reports of arrests of students occupying a University building and possible use of rubber bullets against the protesters.  Here and here are Twitter feeds from people on-site.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Academia | Comments Off on Student Protests at UC Berkeley Campus

Tips for Conveying How Busy and Important You Are

Productivity advice — in the form of books and blogs — has become so ubiquitous that an entire sub-genre of criticism has developed in response.   Now it’s hip to critique as unproductive any focus on day-to-day work productivity (a la David Allen of Getting Things Done fame).

The anonymous blogger   at Grad Hacker offers some”advice”(here) about”How to Act Productive.”  Here’s my attempt at a spoof version for law profs:

What good is your inner, clandestine productivity if your dean, colleagues, students and even you yourself don’t really know the extent of just how unbelievably productive, busy, stressed, in a rush, and important you really are?  Here are some tips on how to communicate this to others at your law school.

  • Tip #1:  Walk fast when on campus and explain to colleagues that you cannot go out to lunch because you are busy responding to law review editors’ comments on your manuscript.
  • Tip #2:  Remind your colleagues how many students you teach, how many exams you have to grade, how frightfully many hours it will take you to grade them, and how grading exams really cuts down the time you can be available for scholarship, service activities, friends or family.
  • Tip #3:  Send an e-mail informing your dean or colleagues that you have been invited to speak at the local Rotary Club or the neighboring town’s PTA meeting.
  • Tip #4:  Bring massive amounts of work to talks by outsiders and student events, and make sure to visibly mark on documents — as if editing your own paper or making comments on student work — in full sight of everyone else in the room.
  • Tip #5: Get ticked off and behave badly at faculty meetings.
  • Tip #6: Do not timely  answer e-mails from anyone who may be relying on you to show up to an event, help review applications or schedule a meeting, then get huffy when the meeting takes place before you respond to the e-mail.
  • Tip #7: Make sure you tell students and administrators, “Now is not a good time.”
  • Tip #8: Pretend that you don’t know how to use the copy machine or create a pdf.
  • Tip #9: Refer to anything you write that is longer than 500 words as an “article.”
  • Tip #10: Check how many times your and your colleagues’ articles have been downloaded on SSRN.
  • Tip #11: Regularly log on to the Westlaw JLR database and search “FIRST /2 LAST % AU(FIRST /2 LAST)” using your own name.
  • Tip #12: Keep your cell phone on during class and all meetings, and let it ring several times before stepping out to answer it.

Productivity Note:  I have shamelessly imported Grad Hacker’s conceptual structure and some of Hacker’s actual language (from here) in order to minimize the time spent blogging about anything other than my own work.  Blogging is unproductive when engaged in regularly and/or with any one or more of the following goals: creating community, critiquing community (or the lack thereof), questioning authority, or increasing awareness of imbalances of wealth, power and/or privilege.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Academia, Yep, sarcasm. | 2 Comments

Where are the Women? Not in the June 2009 Yale Law Journal, that’s for sure.

118 YALE LAW JOURNAL, NO. 8, JUNE, 2009.

Engdahl, David E. The classic rule of faith and credit. 118 Yale L.J. 1584-1659 (2009). [H][L][W]

Cabranes, Hon. Jose A. Our imperial criminal procedure: problems in the extraterritorial application of U.S. constitutional law. 118 Yale L.J. 1660-1711 (2009). [H][L][W]

McGinnis, John O. Medellin and the future of international delegation. 118 Yale L.J. 1712-1760 (2009). [H][L][W]

Paulsen, Michael Stokes. The constitutional power to interpret international law. 118 Yale L.J. 1762-1842 (2009). [H][L][W]

Fox, Dov. Note. Racial classification in assisted reproduction. 118 Yale L.J. 1844-1898 (2009). [H][L][W]

Pahis, Stratos. Note. Corruption in our courts: what it looks like and where it is hidden. 118 Yale L.J. 1900-1943 (2009). [H][L][W]

Gleicher, Nathaniel. Comment. Neither a customer nor a subscriber be: regulating the release of user information on the World Wide Web. 118 Yale L.J. 1945-1954 (2009). [H][L][W]

Index to vol. 118. 118 Yale L.J. 1957-1960 (2009). [H][L][W]

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Academia, Law Schools, The Underrepresentation of Women | 1 Comment

The Pornification of the Household Product Labeling Acts

Another instance of Supposedly Liberal Doods humiliating naked women for a good cause.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Politics, The Overrepresentation of Women | 4 Comments

Where are the Women? The Staff and Advisors of “Media Matters for America” Remain Overwhelmingly Male

The list is here. I (quickly) counted 38 men and 15 women, meaning the list is about 72% male and 28% female. Same old, same old.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Sexism in the Media, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on Where are the Women? The Staff and Advisors of “Media Matters for America” Remain Overwhelmingly Male

Monk and the Baroness: Nica Rothschild’s Contributions to American Jazz History

UntitledLater this month, the documentary film “The Jazz Baroness” will air on cable TV.  The film was made by the English artist (and member of the Rothschild banking family) Hannah Rothschild.  The “Jazz Baroness” explores the life of Kathleen Annie Pannonica Rothschild de Koenigswarter, the filmmaker’s great-aunt and patron of American jazz.

A short write-up (here) in this week’s edition of the (New York) Jewish Week newspaper provides some interesting details about this interesting woman.  Apparently, the Baroness — known as “Nica” — left her husband (the French ambassador to Mexico) and five children to pursue a more bohemian lifestyle in New York.  The Baroness ended up living with jazz great Thelonious Monk.  She supported and befriended many others including Charlie parker, Dizzy Gillespie, Art Blakey and Miles Davis.

Ever wonder where Monk got the titles for songs like “Pannonica” and “Nica’s Dream“?

The basic story of Nica is one of a woman trapped in an unhappy marriage to a French diplomat, the ambassador to Mexico.”My husband liked military drum music; he hated jazz,”Nica is quoted as saying in the film. One day, she heard a recording of Monk’s”Round Midnight,”which appeared to be a transformative experience.

Nica, who was often referred to as”the bebop baroness,”left her family in Mexico, moved to New York, and, in 1954, met Monk in Paris. They were virtually inseparable from then until his death in 1982. Rothschild immersed herself in the New York jazz world and became a patron to many musicians.

She’d pay rent for those who fell behind, buy them groceries if needed and get their instruments out of hock. * * * [I]t was pianist/composer/jazz great Monk who captivated her.”He was a good-looking cat; she was a hottie,”Hanna Rothschild says. Still, she believes it was a platonic relationship.

“Do I think she loved him? Yes, I do. Do I think she was in love with him? I do. Do I think she had an affair? I do not. As a filmmaker, it would have made the story much juicier for me. If they had an affair, I never found one shred of evidence of it.

“I think he loved [his wife] Nellie. I think sexually and physically he and Nellie were very close together.”* * *Rothschild was so committed she was willing to accept a prison term for him, taking responsibility for $10 worth of marijuana found in a car, according to the film. She ultimately got off, but spent a year with the threat of a three-year sentence hanging over her head.

As for what ultimately motivated her great-aunt to leave the family fold after hearing a single record (albeit a beautiful and hip one) and pursue a life immersed in the jazz world, Hannah Rothschild is very willing to admit she stumped.

The story of Dizzy Gillespie’s death in the Baroness’s apartment is one of part of her life history that the film claims to clarify.  Even if it doesn’t, the documentary sounds like a film worth catching.

For vintage video of Monk playing “‘Round Midnight,” the song that Nica de Koenigswarter said changed her life, look below the fold.

-Bridget Crawford

Continue reading

Share
Posted in Feminism and the Arts, Feminist Legal History | Comments Off on Monk and the Baroness: Nica Rothschild’s Contributions to American Jazz History

Where are the Women? Among “Law Stories” Editors

Law Stories is a 30-strong (and growing) volume series published by Foundation Press   and edited by Paul Caron, the Charles Harstock Professor and Associate Dean of Faculty at the University of Cincinnati College of Law.   Each “Stories” volume has its own editors (Paul is the series editor).  

Many of us are familiar with the Law Stories series.   For my  courses, some of my favorite supplemental teaching material comes from the  Tax Stories volume.   There are 50 volume editors in the total series (some volumes have more than one editor).   What a nice surpise to learn that of  all volume editors, 62% (31 out of 50) are male; 38% (19 out of 50) are  female.    

According to the 2007-2008 AALS Directory of Law Teachers, 62.7% of all faculty members are male and 36.9% are female.  

Gender proportionality among the Law Stories series editors!   That’s a bit of pleasant news after a series of rather depressing  observations about women’s representation among authors and speakers in other legal academic arenas.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Law Schools, Law Teaching, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on Where are the Women? Among “Law Stories” Editors

About that study which purportedly found that “Men married to smart women live longer”

The actual title of the paper is: “Marital partner and mortality: The effects of the social positions of both spouses,” by Robert Erikson and Jenny Torssander

From here:

Abstract:
Background: Individual socioeconomic position -like education, social class, social status, and income -are all associated with mortality. Inequalities in death also appear along household measures. It is however less clear how the socioeconomic position of one marital/cohabiting partner influences the mortality of the other partner. We examine the independent effect on mortality of own and partner’s positions regarding these four socioeconomic factors.

Methods: Register data on education, social class, social status, and income of both marital/cohabiting partners were collected from the 1990 Census of the employed Swedish population aged 30-59 (N=1 502 148). Data on all-cause mortality and deaths from cancer and circulatory disease for the subsequent period 1991-2003 were collected from the Cause of Death Register. Relative mortality risks were estimated by Cox regression.

Results: All-cause mortality of both men and women differs by women’s education and status and by men’s social class and income. For men, the wife’s education is more important for the mortality risk than his own education, when the man’s social class is included in the model. For women, the husband’s social class yields larger mortality differences than own occupational measures. Women’s education and men’s social class are particularly important for women’s deaths from circulatory diseases.

Conclusion: The partner’s social position has a clear independent association with individual mortality, and women’s education and men’s social class seem to be particularly important. Suggested explanations of health inequality are not always compatible with the observed relationship between partner’s social and economic resources and mortality.

The entire research report is accessible here (PDF). From the discussion:

Many of the mechanisms suggested as explanations for the connection between the individual position in the stratification structure and mortality:for example, life course strain, status31 and intelligence cannot easily be related to the position of the partner. For example, the IQ hypothesis seems to receive support from the important role of education, but this hypothesis is difficult to reconcile with the weak effect of men’s education when their partner’s education has been controlled for. The background of, for example, large mortality risk differences between social classes and income groups could be based on cumulative effects of experiences over the life-course, even starting before birth, but how should the effects of the partner’s education and occupation be interpreted from a life course perspective? Furthermore, it is difficult to estimate the importance of Marmot’s status syndrome from our results, since status, in his interpretation, is related to almost any hierarchical relation in the social structure. Can we assume that it is also applicable to the partner’s positions? It seems to us that lifestyle and material conditions are the factors most easily reconciled with the results presented here, as partners can be assumed to share lifestyle and women may to a greater extent than men determine the lifestyle of the family, while men stand for most of its economic resources.

It is clear that none of the hypotheses about why there are social differences in mortality between people in different social positions can be ruled out by our results. It is also clear that while all of them may stand for some part of the association, our results suggest that none of them can be assumed to account for a large part of it. However, specific partner characteristics like women’s education and men’s social class are clearly influential beyond own position and other partner characteristics. These more specific mechanisms linking a partner’s socioeconomic position to an individual’s own longevity need to be more carefully studied.

The results of this study have gotten distorted by many different accounts in the mainstream media, as is so common with anything scientific that seems to support the notion that women and men are very different from each other.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Science, Women's Health | 2 Comments

Research Associateships at the Five College Women’s Studies Research Center

From the FLP mailbox, this notice from the Five College Women’s Studies Research Center, a collaboration among Amherst, Hampshire, Mount Holyoke, Smith and UMass Amherst.

The Center invites applications for its RESEARCH ASSOCIATESHIPS for 2010-2011 from scholars and teachers at all levels of the educational system, as well as from artists, community organizers and political activists, both local and international. Associates are provided with offices in our spacious facility, faculty library privileges, and the collegiality of a diverse community of feminists. Research Associate applications are accepted for either a semester or the academic year. The Center supports projects in all disciplines so long as they focus centrally on women or gender. Research Associateships are non-stipendiary. We accept about 15-18 Research Associates per year.

Applicants should submit a project proposal (up to 4 pages), curriculum vitae, two letters of reference, and on-line application cover form. Applications received by February 8 (including letters of recommendation) will receive full consideration. Submit all applications to: Five College Women’s Studies Research Center, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075-6406. Deadline is February 8, 2010. For further information, contact the Center at TEL 413.538.2275, FAX 413.538.3121, email fcwsrc@fivecolleges.edu, website here.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Fellowships and Funding Opportunities | Comments Off on Research Associateships at the Five College Women’s Studies Research Center

Where are the Women? Not in 78% to 88% of NYU Law Review’s Publication Slots

 

Of the 24 professional (i.e., non-student) pieces published so far in Volume 84 of the NYU Law Review, only 5 were single-authored pieces written by women.  That’s only 20.8% written entirely by women.  If one excludes from the count two female United States Supreme Court Justices publishing with NYU (’cause I doubt the Review would have turned down Justices Ginsberg and O’Connor….), then women had only 3 of the single-authored pieces.  That’s 12.5% 13.6%.  Of the 9 student pieces, 2 were written by women.  That’s 22%.

Here are the details:

  • NYU Law Review’s Volume 84: 1 (April 2009 issue) had 3 total articles: 0 articles by women and 3 by men.  1 student note out of 3 was written by a woman.  See prior post here.
  • NYU Law Review’s Volume 84:2 (May 2009 issue) had 3 total articles:  0 articles by women and 3 by men.  1 student note out of 2 was written by a woman.  See prior post here.
  • NYU Law Review’s Volume 84:3 (June 2009 issue) had 12 total articles, essays, lectures or tributes: 4  by women (2 of whom were Supreme Court Justices) and 7 by 8 men (two wrote together).  One article was co-authored by a woman and a man.   0 student notes out of 1 was written by a woman.  See the Table of Contents here.
  • NYU Law Review’s Volume 84:4 (October 2009 issue) had 3 total articles:  1 article by a woman; 1 article by 2 men; 1 article co-authored by a woman and a man. 0 student notes out of 1 was written by a woman.  See the Table of Contents here.
  • NYU Law Review’s Volume 84:5 (November 2009 issue) had 3 articles or lectures: 0 by a woman; 3 by men.  0 student notes out of 2 was written by a woman.  See the Table of Contents here.

Ann previously noted (here) the gender disparity among NYU’s colloquium speakers (79.4% men; 20.6% women).

Is there any explanation for what’s going on at NYU?  NYU students, faculty, staff, what’s happening?  Comments are open.

This is beyond depressing.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Academia, Law Schools | 8 Comments

When the System Separates Immigrant Women from their Children

What if I told you that you could permanently lose custody of your child because you are undocumented?  Or because you do not understand English?  Or because you are unable to communicate with the child welfare system and family court from an immigration detention facility?  What if I told you that you would have to leave your child behind when you are deported, because you may not be granted sufficient time to get the child a passport or coordinate the flight arrangements?      

You might tell me that such things do not happen in the United States of America.  Sadly, you would be wrong.

Check out the full post, “Are Children of Immigrants Becoming Needless Statistics in the Child Welfare System?” by Emily Butera from the Women’s Refugee Commission  over at restorefairness.org.

-Vanessa Merton

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Immigration | Comments Off on When the System Separates Immigrant Women from their Children

New Mammogram Recommendations Patronize Women

mammography machine picture via http://www.cancerquest.org

mammography machine picture via http://www.cancerquest.org

A government task force claims that women don’t need to have routine screening for breast cancer until age 50.   (See the AP story here.)   But the American Cancer Society recommends routine mammograms for women 40 and over.  

The government task force’s reasoning?   Because the “anxieties” caused by mammography, false positives and biopsies do not decrease mortality.  

If the federal government is so concerned about women’s anxieties, how about more jobs, affordable child care, lower tax rates, clean air to breathe,  and an end to discrimination?  

I can control my own anxiety about having my breast squished by a mammography machine, thank you.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Women's Health | 25 Comments

Carnival Against Sexual Violence 82

At Abyss2hope.

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Carnival time!, Feminist Blogs Of Interest | Comments Off on Carnival Against Sexual Violence 82

Where are the Women? – Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Advisory Board Edition: 19 men, 2 women.

UPDATE: All of the EFF Fellows appear to be … fellows.

EFF Advisory Board members as of today per EFF website:

Andrew Bridges is a partner in the San Francisco office of Winston & Strawn LLP where he litigates and counsels clients on complex and cutting-edge disputes and risks pertaining to new technologies and the Internet, particularly in the fields of copyright, trademark, trade secret, consumer protection, unfair competition, and media law.

Michael Froomkin is a professor of law at University of Miami School of Law and an expert in Internet law and constitutional law. He maintains a personal site at http://www.discourse.net, and is an editor of http://www.icannwatch.org/.

Michael Geist is a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law. He is active on copyright, privacy, and Internet issues and was a founder of the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (cippic.ca). He blogs at michaelgeist.ca.

Paul Grewal is a partner at Day Casebeer and an expert in high tech law. He is admitted to practice before various federal courts, as well as before the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Jim Griffin is the CEO of Cherry Lane Digital, a company dedicated to the future of music and entertainment delivery. Griffin also founded the Pho list, where thousands of members meet to discuss digital media.

David Hayes is a partner in the Intellectual Property Group at Fenwick & West LLP and is an expert on copyright law and digital media. He has served as counsel for a number of precedent-setting software copyright infringement cases, including Apple v. Microsoft and the Napster case.

Bernt Hugenholz

Mitch Kapor is one of EFF’s founders as well as the founder of the Lotus Development Corporation. He is also founder and chair of the Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF). He keeps a website at http://www.kapor.com/.

Mark Lemley is a professor at Stanford Law School and is director of the Stanford Center for Law, Science and Technology. He is the author of several books and has testified before Congress and the FTC on patent, antitrust, and constitutional law matters. He is of counsel at Durie Tangri Lemley Roberts & Kent.

Eben Moglen is Professor of Law at Columbia University, and pro bono General Counsel of the Free Software Foundation. He was a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall of the US Supreme Court, holds a PhD in legal history, and is the author of many articles and essays about the free software and free culture movements.

Tom Moore has his own small firm, The Moore Law Group, in Palo Alto, California, from which he represents technology-oriented companies and individuals in general commercial, intellectual property and boardroom disputes. Tom has collaborated with the EFF on various projects since January 2000, including defending Andrew Bunner’s right to publish DVD decryption software on his website, defending the rights of online journalists to protect their confidential sources and defending against an attempt by Visa International to monopolize use of the word”visa”in domain names.

Deirdre Mulligan is an Assistant Professor at the UC Berkeley School of Information. Professor Mulligan’s current research agenda focuses on information privacy and security. She was previously a clinical professor of law and the director of the Samuelson Law, Technology & Public Policy Clinic.

Craig Newmark Craig Newmark is the founder of craigslist.org, a site where people can help each other with everyday needs including housing and jobs. He’s also working with a wide range of groups using the Net to help each other out, like Donorschoose.org, the Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America, Kiva.org and LendforPeace.org (microfinance), and Consumer Reports. Craig is also actively engaged with government workers on multiple levels to use the Net for superior public service, and with Sunlight Foundation for government accountability and transparency. He’s not as funny as he thinks he is, but sometimes can’t help himself.

Michael Page is a partner at Durie Tangri Page Lemley Roberts & Kent LLP. Michael specializes in cutting-edge copyright litigation, representing such clients as Grokster, Troy Augusto, Shepard Fairey, 321 Studios, and others.

Bruce Schneier is a security technologist and author of eight books — including Beyond Fear and Secrets and Lies — and hundreds of articles and academic papers. His influential newsletter “Crypto-Gram,” and his blog “Schneier on Security,” are read by over 250,000 people. Schneier is the Chief Security Technology Officer of BT.

Barbara Simons is on the Board of Advisors of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. She was a member of the workshop, convened at the request of President Clinton, that produced a report critical of Internet Voting in 2001. She also co-authored the report that led to the cancellation of DoD’s Internet voting project (SERVE) because of security concerns. Simons, a former ACM President, co-chaired the ACM study of statewide databases of registered voters, and she co-authored the League of Women Voters report on election auditing. She is co-authoring a book on voting machines with Doug Jones. Simons is retired from IBM Research.

Daniel J. Solove is a professor of law at the George Washington University Law School. He is the author of several books, including Understanding Privacy (Harvard 2008), The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet (Yale 2007), The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information Age (NYU 2004), and Information Privacy Law (Aspen 3d ed. 2009) (with Paul M. Schwartz). His work focuses on information privacy law, criminal procedure, national security, law and literature, legal theory, First Amendment, and other topics.

Michael Traynor is a former partner at Cooley Godward, LLP, where he specialized in intellectual property, business and First Amendment litigation. He is also former president of the American Law Institute.

Jim Tyre is an attorney and EFF fellow who has represented free speech interests for more than 30 years. He is a founder of The Censorware Project, which provides public information about censorware products.

Richard R. Wiebe is a San Francisco lawyer with his own public interest practice focusing on free speech, intellectual property, and environmental issues. Rick works regularly with EFF on lawsuits protecting civil liberties in the digitial world, including defending Andrew Bunner’s right to publish DVD decryption software on his website, defending the rights of online journalists to protect their confidential sources, and defending the copyright fair use rights of digital video recorder owners. He has also worked with EFF to expose the weaknesses of electronic voting technology and advocate for a voter-verified paper trail.

Ethan Zuckerman is a senior researcher at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University where he studies technology adaptation in the developing world. He is co-founder of Global Voices, an international citizen media community focused on free speech and media diversity. He blogs at My Heart’s In Accra.

*******************************************

Eight out of ten members of EFF’s Board of Directors are also male.

Continue reading

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and Technology, The Underrepresentation of Women | Comments Off on Where are the Women? – Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Advisory Board Edition: 19 men, 2 women.

New Global Gender Gap Report

The World Economic Forum published the new Global Gender Gap Report on October 27th.   It ranks countries on how equitably resources   and opportunities are allocated across their male and female populations.   It bases these rankings on data pertaining to economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political entitlement.   The report is accessible here.   A figure of 1.0 would indicate complete equality.   Iceland is in first place with the top score of 0.8276. The United States is ranked 31st with a score of 0.7173. Yemen is ranked last -134th – with a score of 0.4609.

Via.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Economics, Feminism and Politics, Sisters In Other Nations | 2 Comments

“As similar as this basketball arena may appear to your apartment, they are not, in fact, the same place. For further evidence, please ask yourself the following question: Does my apartment typically contain 20,000 complete strangers? If the answer is “No,” then you are in a public arena. You should not be watching porn.”

From this article at the WaPo.   Via.

Roxie has some questions. Meanwhile, I recently flew to and from a distant city, and on one of the legs of the journey, the dood sitting next to me was watching porn.   Really racist porn, it appeared to be, attempting to heavily erotizice several demeaning sterotypes.   And he was jiggling his legs a lot.

At a certain point I tapped him on the shoulder and said, “She doesn’t look like she is enjoying that very much.” He shot me a dirty look but he also closed his laptop. Which he placed on his lap over the lump in his pants, which was having some kind of wrestling match with his seat belt.   And then his whole body rose, and he went and spent extensive personal time in the lavatory, which was   the only lav in the entire plane. Thus putting the “jerk” in jerk off.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Travels | Comments Off on “As similar as this basketball arena may appear to your apartment, they are not, in fact, the same place. For further evidence, please ask yourself the following question: Does my apartment typically contain 20,000 complete strangers? If the answer is “No,” then you are in a public arena. You should not be watching porn.”

The Wrong Stuff: Middle District of Florida Seemingly Revives Narrow, Pre-Burlington Reading of Title VII’s Antiretaliation Provision in Action Against NASA

You are an employee at NASA at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). In 2004, you file an informal complaint with the EEOC for discrimination and harassment, alleging that your superior sent e-mails to you and others in your department containing pictures of your face superimposed on a nude topless picture of a woman jet skiing. You agree to have the matter referred to ADR, after which you receive a monetary payment, restoration of leave lost due to the incident, and other benefits.

The following year, you file a formal complaint with the EEOC, alleging gender discrimination and retaliation arising out of NASA‘s failure to promote you. The EEOC finds that you were the “superior applicant for the position” and denied the promotion in part due to discrimination on the basis of your sex and retaliation for your participation in prior protected EEOC activity. The EEOC order also states that NASA should consider whether to discipline any of the persons involved in the failure to promote you. NASA, however, does not discipline any of these individuals. You bring two more EEOC actions, after which the EEOC adds suggested discipline against the persons involved in the failure to promote. NASA, however, still does not discipline any of these individuals.

Thereafter, you bring an action against the administrator of NASA, claiming that you have been intentionally discriminated against, intentionally harassed, and intentionally retaliated against because of your opposition to NASA‘s unlawful employment practices. Part of your claim is that NASA‘s decision not to discipline the persons involved in the failure to promote you was itself further retaliation against you and resulted in the same individuals further discriminating and retaliating against you. In determining whether evidence of this challenged action — failure to discipline — will be admissible at trial, the court has to determine whether a reasonable employee would have found the challenged action materially adverse, i.e., whether the challenged action might well have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge or discrimination. The court rules against you. This post explains why I disagree.

Continue reading

Share
Posted in Courts and the Judiciary, Employment Discrimination, Feminism and the Workplace | 1 Comment

Jennifer M. Keighley, “Health Care Reform and Reproductive Rights: Sex Equality Arguments for Abortion Coverage in a National Plan”

Abstract:
The national health insurance reform effort threatens to reduce the number of women who have health insurance coverage for abortions. Instead of evaluating whether the Supreme Court would invalidate restrictions on coverage, I employ a model of legislative constitutionalism that presents arguments for why Congress must independently consider the constitutionality of imposing restrictions on abortion in national health insurance legislation. I argue that Congress’s debate over abortion coverage in a national health insurance scheme should recognize the emerging understanding of the equality interests that are raised by state regulation of women’s reproductive capacities.

Downloadable here.

NB: Jennifer M. Keighley is a 3L at Yale Law School and notes: “The draft online has not been updated after last weekend’s debate in the House, but a new draft will be posted next week.”

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminist Legal Scholarship, Reproductive Rights, Women's Health | Comments Off on Jennifer M. Keighley, “Health Care Reform and Reproductive Rights: Sex Equality Arguments for Abortion Coverage in a National Plan”

“The Hard Sell”

Check out Stiletto Revolt for a stunning collection of ads with phallic imagery. Two examples below:

null

null

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media | Comments Off on “The Hard Sell”

“Films for the Feminist Classroom”

The “Films for the Feminist Classroom” Collective has made available (here) its second issue of its review periodical.  Here’s a general description of the periodical:

Films for the Feminist Classroom (FFC) is an online journal hosted by the  Rutgers-based editorial offices of  Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. FFC publishes film reviews that provide a critical assessment of the value of films as pedagogical tools in the feminist classroom. Interviews with directors and producers of feminist film are also included in FFC issues. FFC endeavors to become a dynamic resource for feminist teachers.

The second issue  includes reviews of

  • Very Young Girls;
  • Tillie Olsen:  A Heart in Action;
  • The Changing Face of Feminist Psychology; and
  • La  Bruja: A Witch from the Bronx.

The Collective invites proposals for future film reviews for future issues.  More info is available here.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Feminism and the Arts | 1 Comment

“Shelly Goldstein — Stupid Callous Homophobic Hateful Legislation”

Share
Posted in It's satire, in case that requires pointing out, LGBT Rights | Comments Off on “Shelly Goldstein — Stupid Callous Homophobic Hateful Legislation”

Feminist Concern Troll Bingo!

null

Via.

Share
Posted in Blog Administration | 3 Comments

“Catharine MacKinnon and law as courage, emotion, and social change”

From the Harvard Law Record:

When Catharine MacKinnon said goodbye to us at the end of her Sex Equality class on Wednesday October 28, she choked up, and we all choked up with her. The emotion was evident in her voice as she read us a passage from Virginia Woolf’s A Room of One’s Own that can be found in the center of MacKinnon’s Sex Equality textbook. The passage entreats us to work: it reminds us of why we work at all, and describes vividly the people for whom we work when we work on sex equality …

… We all choked up along with Professor MacKinnon as she read, because we know from our own experiences that what she read is true: we know that Shakespeare’s sister is dead and that she won’t rise up unless we work. We know that Virginia Woolf wouldn’t have been allowed to enter Harvard Law School because it did not admit women at that time. We know it to be true that if we sit here and do nothing women will not advance. And so we tear up and we jump to our feet and we clap our hands, because we’ve made it inside these hallowed institutions that Woolf dreamed of entering, and so now we have the power to resurrect the poet, to let her be born in great numbers in the next generation. We felt our own privilege in that moment, but it was not the usual privilege and arrogance regarding Harvard’s rank in the world and our rank along with it; it was privilege with meaning and power to affect change. It is the privilege to use our law degrees to improve the lives of those who are truly depending on the law for help.

Read the entire essay here.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, Feminists in Academia, Law Schools | Comments Off on “Catharine MacKinnon and law as courage, emotion, and social change”

“The gunman and the dead woman apparently had a “relationship,” Tualatin Police Chief Kent Barker said.”

Yet another man murders yet another woman.

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Feminism and Culture | Comments Off on “The gunman and the dead woman apparently had a “relationship,” Tualatin Police Chief Kent Barker said.”

Yes the violence used by this soccer player is chilling, but her gender is what some find the most shocking.

YouTube commenters are writing things like “I WOULD FUCK HER UP!!!!!…what a bitch!” and “Bitch. Kill her!” apparently without irony. A number of copies of this or related video clips are titled with references to “cat fights.” This NYT article questions what role the coach and referees played in allowing or even encouraging the violence, but never puts the level of violence into context. Watch this video, and this one. Men play soccer very aggressively too. Doesn’t make the violence okay, but it makes the current media focus on one woman player odd to say the least.

–Ann Bartow

ETA: See also.

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Feminism and Culture, Feminism and Sports, Sexism in the Media | 3 Comments

Welcome to the Blogosphere, Feminist Law Students at the University of Toronto

The Feminist Law Students’ Association at the University of Toronto has started a blog (here):

The Feminist Law Students’ Association at the University of Toronto is a group of law students whose overarching goal is to recognize and promote the discussion of gender inequalities within both the law school community and society at large. We hope to break down misconceptions about feminism, and to raise awareness about what feminist legal studies can offer individuals of all genders and backgrounds.TornontoLogo

Our plans for the upcoming academic year include study groups to allow students to discuss gender issues that might not be raised in traditional classroom readings of legal materials, panels and workshops to highlight the important feminist academic work faculty members are conducting, and supporting community activist groups who do feminist legal work.

This blog includes information about upcoming events and initiatives, as well as occasional commentaries on cases and current events, in order to provide an example of what a feminist perspective can offer legal analysis.

Feminist Law Students’ Association at UT, welcome to the blogosphere!

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Feminist Blogs Of Interest | Comments Off on Welcome to the Blogosphere, Feminist Law Students at the University of Toronto

Being a woman is not a pre-existing condition

Share
Posted in Feminism and Medicine, Feminism and Politics, Women's Health | 1 Comment

“AIDS Is The No. 1 Cause Of Death, Disease For Women 15-44, Says WHO”

And how much do rape, pornography and prostitution contribute to the spread of AIDS? Wish there was some data on that, but not holding my breath. From the HuffPo:

In its first study of women’s health around the globe, the World Health Organization said Monday that the AIDS virus is the leading cause of death and disease among women between the ages of 15 and 44.

Unsafe sex is the leading risk factor in developing countries for these women of childbearing age, with others including lack of access to contraceptives and iron deficiency, the WHO said. Throughout the world, one in five deaths among women in this age group is linked to unsafe sex, according to the U.N. agency.

“Women who do not know how to protect themselves from such infections, or who are unable to do so, face increased risks of death or illness,” WHO said in a 91-page report. “So do those who cannot protect themselves from unwanted pregnancy or control their fertility because of lack of access to contraception.” …

If prostitution actually was voluntary and consensual, if pornographers actually respected the wishes and bodily integrity of performers, if contraceptives actually were freely available, how different the world would be for women.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Acts of Violence, Coerced Sex, Women's Health | 3 Comments

CFP: Law, Gender & Citizenship – Contemporary Issues for American Indians and American Immigrants

The student editors  of the University of Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender & Society remind us that abstracts for consideration for the Journal’s upcoming symposium on  “Law, Gender & Citizenship: Contemporary Issues for American Indians and American Immigrants” are due on November 15, 2009.    

The original call for participation is here.

-Bridget Crawford

Share
Posted in Call for Papers or Participation, Upcoming Conferences | Comments Off on CFP: Law, Gender & Citizenship – Contemporary Issues for American Indians and American Immigrants

Where are the women? Not organizing or participating in very many colloquia at NYU Law, apparently.

From this site:

Fall 2009 Colloquia

Constitutional Theory Colloquium
Professors David Golove and Richard Pildes

Hauser Colloquium:   Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Law
Professor Ryan Goodman

Colloquium in Legal, Political and Social Philosophy
Professors Ronald Dworkin and Thomas Nagel

Colloquium on Law, Economics and Politics
Professors John Ferejohn and Lewis Kornhauser

Legal History Colloquium
Professor William Nelson

Hoffinger Criminal Justice Colloquium
Professor  James Jacobs

Spring 2010 Colloquia

Institute for International Law and Justice Colloquium
Professors Benedict Kingsbury and J. H. H. Weiler

Law and Economics Colloquium
Professors Barry Adler and Oren Bar-Gill

Legal History Colloquium
Professors Daniel Hulsebosch and John Phillip Reid

Tax Policy Colloquium
Professor Daniel Shaviro

Colloquium on Innovation Policy
Professors Rochelle Dreyfuss and Barton Beebe

Not surprisingly, the speakers at each colloquium are overwhelmingly male also.   Quick tallies are as follows:

Constitutional Theory Colloquium – 7 men, 2 women

Hauser Colloquium: Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Law – 7 men, 3 women (two of the men are presenting together)

Colloquium in Legal, Political and Social Philosophy – 11 men, two women (one of the women is co-presenting with one of the men)

Colloquium on Law, Economics and Politics – 5 men, 2 women

Legal History Colloquium – 9 men, 3 women (two of the men are presenting twice, so men take up 11 slots)

Hoffinger Criminal Justice Colloquium – 6 men, 1 woman

Spring 2010 Colloquia

Institute for International Law and Justice Colloquium – 8 men, 2 women

Law and Economics Colloquium – 5 men, 2 women

Legal History Colloquium – speaker list not posted

Tax Policy Colloquium – 10 men, 4 women

Colloquium on Innovation Policy – speaker list not posted

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminism and Law, The Underrepresentation of Women, Upcoming Conferences, Upcoming Lectures | 3 Comments

Dang.

From a post entitled “Coffee and Consent” at Female Impersonator:

From Until Someone Wakes Up, a play written by Carolyn Levy and a group of Macalester College students:

Waiter: Would you like some coffee?
Woman: Yes, please.
Waiter: Just say when. (Starts to pour.)
Woman: There. (He keeps pouring.) That’s fine. (He pours.) Stop! (She grabs the pot; there is coffee everywhere.)
Waiter: Yes, ma’am.
Woman: Well, why didn’t you stop pouring?
Waiter: Oh, I wasn’t sure you meant it.
Woman: Look, of course I meant it! I have coffee all over my lap! You nearly burned me!
Waiter: Forgive me, ma’am, but you certainly looked thirsty. I thought you wanted more.
Woman: But –
Waiter: And you must admit, you did let me start to pour.

Share
Posted in Coerced Sex, Feminism and Culture | 2 Comments

Republicans Sure Did a Lot of Objecting When Women Tried to Speak

From House debate about the Stupak Amendment:

Via.

Share
Posted in Feminism and Law, Feminism and Politics | 2 Comments

NAWL 2009 National Survey on Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms

From this site:

On October 26, 2009, the NAWL and the NAWL Foundation released the results of the fourth annual Survey on Retention and Promotion of Women in Law Firms. The Survey is the only national study of the nation’s 200 largest law firms which annually tracks the progress of women lawyers at all levels of private practice, including the most senior positions, and collects data on firms as a whole rather than from a subset of individual lawyers. The 2009 Survey underscores that women are significantly under-represented in the upper levels of law firms and that the large majority of women who start as associates in firms do not advance to equity partnership and even fewer become law firm leaders. Male lawyers remain the most powerful and best compensated members of firms, hold the vast majority of ownership shares, dominate firm governing committees and represent the overwhelming number of major rainmakers in firms. The co-authors of the Survey are NAWL Foundation President Stephanie Scharf, Partner at Schoeman Updike Kaufman & Scharf in Chicago, Cheryl Tama Oblander, Partner at Butler Rubin Saltarelli & Boyd LLP in Chicago, Marianne Trost, Principal, The Women Lawyers Coach LLC, and Elizabeth Tipton, MPES Fellow, Department of Statistics, Northwestern University.
• Press Release (PDF)

• NAWL 2009 Survey (PDF)

Share
Posted in Legal Profession, The Underrepresentation of Women | 2 Comments

“Her Secret? Photoshop”

Watch the actual photo shoot at this site, then see if you can figure out what has been changed. Via.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Feminism and Culture, Sexism in the Media | 2 Comments

“I get knocked down: Women publishing law review notes”

Rebecca Tushnet writes:

I read an interesting article in the Journal of Legal Education (unfortunately not online) about the underrepresentation, relative to law school enrollment and law review participation, of women publishing notes on the main journals of the top law schools. The author theorizes that women are more alienated from law school than men. Writing a note may seem like one more awful hurdle in a system that has proved less meaningful than they hoped. I was particularly interested in statistics from a study of the Yale Law Journal revealing that one source of the disparity was that women were only one-third as likely as men to resubmit their proposed notes after an initial rejection; given that most notes are only published after resubmission, this was a big deal. That brought back some powerful memories of my experience, which I share in the hope of encouraging more students:especially women:to try the publication process.

Read her entire post here.

–Ann Bartow

Share
Posted in Academia, Feminists in Academia, Law Schools, The Underrepresentation of Women | 2 Comments